Campion P D, Butler N M, Cox A D
Department of General Practice, University of Liverpool.
Fam Pract. 1992 Jun;9(2):181-90. doi: 10.1093/fampra/9.2.181.
Seventy-three general practice interviews were analysed according to the method described by Butler et al. Results for the three principal agenda types (physical, emotional and social) are presented in terms of the control exerted by either doctor or patient in determining the content of the interview. Both doctor and patient address physical agendas to a similar high degree. In contrast, patients present emotional agendas to a far greater extent than doctors address these concerns. The findings for social agendas are intermediate between those for physical and those for emotional agendas. It is argued that doctors can facilitate the expression of emotional and social agendas by giving explicit or implicit permission for their presence in the interview.
根据巴特勒等人描述的方法，对73次全科医疗访谈进行了分析。针对三种主要议程类型（身体、情感和社会）的结果，是根据医生或患者在确定访谈内容时所施加的控制来呈现的。医生和患者在很大程度上都涉及身体议程。相比之下，患者提出情感议程的程度远高于医生处理这些问题的程度。社会议程的调查结果介于身体议程和情感议程之间。有人认为，医生可以通过明确或含蓄地允许在访谈中提及情感和社会议程，来促进这些议程的表达。
