Carter M L
Department of Anaesthesia, Bundaberg Base Hospital, PO Box 34, Bundaberg, Qld 4670.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2004 Feb;32(1):11-21. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0403200102.
This review looks at the evidence for the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in various chronic pain states. Spinal cord stimulation can only be effective when appropriate dorsal column fibres in the spinal cord are preserved and able to be stimulated. Spinal cord stimulation has been shown to have little to offer for patients with some diagnoses. Although 50 to 60% of patients with failed back surgery syndrome obtain significant pain relief with this technique, the strength of the evidence available is insufficient to clearly advocate its use in all patients with this condition. Though limited in quantity and quality, better evidence exists for its use in neuropathic pain, complex regional pain syndrome, angina pectoris and critical limb ischaemia. There is a lack of high quality evidence relating to spinal cord stimulation due to difficulties in conducting randomized controlled trials in this area. Serious methodological problems are encountered in blinding, recruitment and assessment in nearly all published trials of spinal cord stimulation. Suggestions regarding appropriate methodologies for trials which would produce better quality evidence are summarized.
本综述探讨了脊髓刺激在各种慢性疼痛状态下有效性的证据。脊髓刺激只有在脊髓中适当的背柱纤维得以保留并能够被刺激时才会有效。脊髓刺激已被证明对某些诊断的患者作用不大。尽管50%至60%的腰椎手术失败综合征患者通过该技术获得了显著的疼痛缓解,但现有证据的力度不足以明确主张在所有患有该病症的患者中使用该技术。尽管在数量和质量上有限,但在神经性疼痛、复杂性区域疼痛综合征、心绞痛和严重肢体缺血方面,有更好的证据支持其使用。由于在该领域进行随机对照试验存在困难,缺乏与脊髓刺激相关的高质量证据。几乎所有已发表的脊髓刺激试验在盲法、招募和评估方面都遇到了严重的方法学问题。总结了关于能产生更高质量证据的试验的适当方法的建议。