• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Use of thrombolysis for myocardial infarction in Israel].

作者信息

Behar S

机构信息

Neufeld Cardiac Research Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer.

出版信息

Harefuah. 1992 Jun 15;122(12):753-6, 820.

PMID:1505818
Abstract

Thrombolysis is generally accepted as the initial treatment for acute myocardial infarction. The extent to which this therapy is being implemented in Israel and the reasons for exclusion of cases from thrombolytic therapy were prospectively investigated. 413 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction hospitalized during January 1990 in 18 of Israel's 25 coronary care units were studied. Thrombolytic therapy was administered to 145 patients (35%: 38% of the men and 29% of the women; NS). It was used more often in those up to the age of 75 (38%) than in those over (18%, p less than 0.005) and in those with a first or anterior infarction (40% and 48%, respectively) than those with recurrent or inferior infarction (23% and 31%, respectively; p less than 0.005 for both). The 2 most frequent reasons for not using thrombolysis were late arrival in the coronary care unit (33%) and absence of ST elevation on the admission electrocardiogram (28%). Hospital mortality was 6% in the thrombolytic group versus 20% in those ineligible for thrombolysis. The significance of this difference is not clear as there was no randomization to treatment.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Use of thrombolysis for myocardial infarction in Israel].
Harefuah. 1992 Jun 15;122(12):753-6, 820.
2
Mortality trends in men and women with acute myocardial infarction in coronary care units in Israel. A comparison between 1981-1983 and 1992-1994. For the SPRINT and the Israeli Thrombolytic Survey Groups.以色列冠心病监护病房中急性心肌梗死男性和女性的死亡率趋势。1981 - 1983年与1992 - 1994年的比较。为SPRINT和以色列溶栓研究组撰写。
Eur Heart J. 2000 Feb;21(4):284-95. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1868.
3
Frequency of use of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction in Israel.以色列急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗的使用频率。
Am J Cardiol. 1991 Nov 15;68(13):1291-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90233-b.
4
On-site catheterization laboratory and prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. Israeli Thrombolytic Survey Group.急性心肌梗死后的现场导管实验室与预后。以色列溶栓研究小组。
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Apr 24;155(8):813-7.
5
[Are ECG criteria for indications for thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarct defined too narrowly?].[急性心肌梗死溶栓指征的心电图标准定义是否过于狭窄?]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1991 Dec 7;121(49):1829-32.
6
Factors influencing the time to thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Time to Thrombolysis Substudy of the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-1.影响急性心肌梗死溶栓时间的因素。心肌梗死国家注册研究-1的溶栓时间子研究。
Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(22):2577-82.
7
[The early management of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction in the Lombardy Region (GestIMA)].[伦巴第地区ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死的早期管理(GestIMA)]
Ital Heart J Suppl. 2005 Aug;6(8):489-97.
8
Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention after failed thrombolysis: results from the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israel Surveys (ACSIS).溶栓失败后补救性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:以色列急性冠状动脉综合征调查(ACSIS)结果
Acute Card Care. 2006;8(2):83-6. doi: 10.1080/17482940600757221.
9
Prognostic significance of precordial ST segment depression on admission electrocardiogram in patients with inferior wall myocardial infarction.下壁心肌梗死患者入院心电图胸前导联ST段压低的预后意义
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Aug;28(2):313-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00173-8.
10
Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the french registry on acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAST-MI).ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死溶栓后广泛应用经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:来自法国急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死注册研究(FAST-MI)的数据
Circulation. 2008 Jul 15;118(3):268-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.762765. Epub 2008 Jun 30.