Kawaguchi Isao, Sasaki Akira, Mogi Motoyoshi
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kyushu University Graduate Schools, Fukukoka, Japan.
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Feb 7;271(1536):301-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2575.
Strategies to eradicate the vector-borne infectious diseases (e.g. malaria and Japanese encephalitis) are often directed at controlling vectors with insecticides. Spraying insecticide, however, opens the way for the development of insecticide resistance in vectors, which may lead to the failure of disease control. In this paper, we examine whether the combined use of insecticide spray and zooprophylaxis can limit the development of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. Zooprophylaxis refers to the control of vector-borne diseases by attracting vectors to domestic animals in which the pathogen cannot amplify (a dead-end host). The human malaria parasite Plasmodium spp. has a closed transmission cycle between humans and mosquitoes, and hence cattle can serve as a dead-end host. Our model reveals that, by a suitable choice of insecticide spraying rate and cattle density and location, malaria can, in some situations, be controlled without mosquitoes developing insecticide resistance.
根除媒介传播的传染病(如疟疾和日本脑炎)的策略通常旨在使用杀虫剂来控制病媒。然而,喷洒杀虫剂为病媒产生抗药性开辟了道路,这可能导致疾病控制的失败。在本文中,我们研究了杀虫剂喷洒与动物诱捕预防法的联合使用是否能限制蚊子产生抗药性。动物诱捕预防法是指通过将病媒吸引到病原体无法繁殖的家畜(终末宿主)上来控制媒介传播疾病。人类疟原虫疟原虫属在人类和蚊子之间有一个封闭的传播循环,因此牛可以作为终末宿主。我们的模型表明,通过适当选择杀虫剂喷洒率、牛的密度和位置,在某些情况下,可以在蚊子不产生抗药性的情况下控制疟疾。