Zapata David A, Schamel Wolfgang W A, Torres Pilar S, Alarcón Balbino, Rossi Nineth E, Navarro María N, Toribio María L, Regueiro José R
Inmunología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
J Biol Chem. 2004 Jun 4;279(23):24485-92. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311455200. Epub 2004 Apr 1.
We have reported the existence of biochemical and conformational differences in the alphabeta T cell receptor (TCR) complex between CD4(+) and CD8(+) CD3gamma-deficient (gamma(-)) mature T cells. In the present study, we have furthered our understanding and extended the observations to primary T lymphocytes from normal (gamma(+)) individuals. Surface TCR.CD3 components from CD4(+) gamma(-) T cells, other than CD3gamma, were detectable and similar in size to CD4(+) gamma(+) controls. Their native TCR.CD3 complex was also similar to CD4(+) gamma(+) controls, except for an alphabeta(deltaepsilon)(2)zeta(2) instead of an alphabetagammaepsilondeltaepsilonzeta(2) stoichiometry. In contrast, the surface TCRalpha, TCRbeta, and CD3delta chains of CD8(+) gamma(-) T cells did not possess their usual sizes. Using confocal immunofluorescence, TCRalpha was hardly detectable in CD8(+) gamma(-) T cells. Blue native gels (BN-PAGE) demonstrated the existence of a heterogeneous population of TCR.CD3 in these cells. Using primary peripheral blood T lymphocytes from normal (gamma(+)) donors, we performed a broad epitopic scan. In contrast to all other TCR.CD3-specific monoclonal antibodies, RW2-8C8 stained CD8(+) better than it did CD4(+) T cells, and the difference was dependent on glycosylation of the TCR.CD3 complex but independent of T cell activation or differentiation. RW2-8C8 staining of CD8(+) T cells was shown to be more dependent on lipid raft integrity than that of CD4(+) T cells. Finally, immunoprecipitation studies on purified primary CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells revealed the existence of TCR glycosylation differences between the two. Collectively, these results are consistent with the existence of conformational or topological lineage-specific differences in the TCR.CD3 from CD4(+) and CD8(+) wild type T cells. The differences may be relevant for cis interactions during antigen recognition and signal transduction.
我们已经报道了在CD4(+)和CD8(+) CD3γ缺陷(γ(-))成熟T细胞之间,αβ T细胞受体(TCR)复合物存在生化和构象差异。在本研究中,我们进一步加深了理解,并将观察结果扩展到来自正常(γ(+))个体的原代T淋巴细胞。除了CD3γ外,CD4(+)γ(-) T细胞表面的TCR.CD3成分可被检测到,且大小与CD4(+)γ(+)对照相似。它们的天然TCR.CD3复合物也与CD4(+)γ(+)对照相似,只是化学计量比为αβ(δε)₂ζ₂而非αβγεδεζ₂。相比之下,CD8(+)γ(-) T细胞表面的TCRα、TCRβ和CD3δ链没有其通常的大小。使用共聚焦免疫荧光法,在CD8(+)γ(-) T细胞中几乎检测不到TCRα。蓝色原胶(BN-PAGE)显示这些细胞中存在异质性的TCR.CD3群体。我们使用来自正常(γ(+))供体的原代外周血T淋巴细胞进行了广泛的表位扫描。与所有其他TCR.CD3特异性单克隆抗体不同,RW2-8C8对CD8(+) T细胞的染色优于对CD4(+) T细胞的染色,且这种差异取决于TCR.CD3复合物的糖基化,而与T细胞活化或分化无关。结果表明,RW2-8C8对CD8(+) T细胞的染色比CD4(+) T细胞更依赖脂筏完整性。最后,对纯化的原代CD4(+)和CD8(+) T细胞进行的免疫沉淀研究揭示了两者之间存在TCR糖基化差异。总体而言,这些结果与CD4(+)和CD8(+)野生型T细胞的TCR.CD3中存在构象或拓扑谱系特异性差异一致。这些差异可能与抗原识别和信号转导过程中的顺式相互作用有关。