• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南印度结核分枝杆菌菌株对结核放线菌素的敏感性

Susceptibility of south Indian strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to tuberactinomycin.

作者信息

Selvakumar N, Kumar V, Acharyulu G S, Rehman F, Paramasivan C N, Prabhakar R

机构信息

Tuberculosis Research Centre, Madras.

出版信息

Indian J Med Res. 1992 May;95:101-4.

PMID:1506058
Abstract

A total of 114 strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from sputum samples of 114 patients of pulmonary tuberculosis in south India, were coded and tested for their in vitro susceptibility to tuberactinomycin (Tum) incorporated in Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium. Of these strains, 95 (83.3%) and 15 (13.2%) were susceptible to Tum at 25 and 50 mg/l respectively. Only 4 (3.5%) strains were inhibited at 100 mg/l or more. Of the 37 drug sensitive strains, 2 (5.4%) were not susceptible to Tum at 25 mg/l compared to 17 (22.1%) of 77 strains-resistant to one or more of antituberculosis drugs (P less than 0.02). The drug susceptibility pattern of the strains revealed that there was no significant association of resistance between Tum and streptomycin or rifampicin or ethambutol or ethionamide or isoniazid. However, 15 (53.6%) of 28 kanamycin (K) resistant strains were not susceptible to Tum at 25 mg/l. This cross resistance between Tum and K was further studied in 24 and 15 K sensitive and resistant strains respectively, by correlating their proportion resistance at 16 mg/l and it was found to have a significant positive correlation (r = 0.55; P less than 0.01).

摘要

从印度南部114例肺结核患者痰液样本中分离出的总共114株结核分枝杆菌,被编码并检测其对添加在罗-琴(LJ)培养基中的结核放线菌素(Tum)的体外敏感性。在这些菌株中,分别有95株(83.3%)和15株(13.2%)在25mg/l和50mg/l时对Tum敏感。只有4株(3.5%)在100mg/l及以上浓度时受到抑制。在37株药物敏感菌株中,2株(5.4%)在25mg/l时对Tum不敏感,而在77株对一种或多种抗结核药物耐药的菌株中,有17株(22.1%)不敏感(P<0.02)。菌株的药敏模式显示,Tum与链霉素、利福平、乙胺丁醇、乙硫异烟胺或异烟肼之间的耐药性无显著关联。然而,28株对卡那霉素(K)耐药的菌株中有15株(53.6%)在25mg/l时对Tum不敏感。分别在24株K敏感菌株和15株K耐药菌株中,通过关联它们在16mg/l时的比例耐药性,进一步研究了Tum与K之间的这种交叉耐药性,发现两者具有显著的正相关(r = 0.55;P<0.01)。

相似文献

1
Susceptibility of south Indian strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to tuberactinomycin.南印度结核分枝杆菌菌株对结核放线菌素的敏感性
Indian J Med Res. 1992 May;95:101-4.
2
[In vitro susceptibility testing of nontuberculous mycobacteria to streptomycin, kanamycin and enviomycin].
Kekkaku. 1989 Sep;64(9):557-62.
3
[Experimental studies in vitro on the antituberculous activities of tuberactinomycin (TUM) and tuberactinomycin-N (TUM-N) (author's transl)].
Kekkaku. 1977 May;52(5):211-8.
4
Prevalence of initial drug resistance to M. tuberculosis in new sputum positive RNTCP patients.新痰涂片阳性的印度国家结核病控制规划(RNTCP)患者中结核分枝杆菌初始耐药的患病率。
J Commun Dis. 2003 Jun;35(2):82-9.
5
[Comparison of proportion method in Löwenstein-Jensen medium with the BACTEC 460 TB system for antimycobacterial susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates].[用于结核分枝杆菌分离株抗分枝杆菌药敏试验的罗氏培养基比例法与BACTEC 460 TB系统的比较]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2011 Oct;45(4):623-31.
6
Drug resistance in tuberculosis in Delhi: a 2 year profile (2001--2002).德里结核病的耐药性:两年概况(2001 - 2002年)
J Commun Dis. 2003 Jun;35(2):74-81.
7
A study of primary drug resistance in pulmonary tuberculosis in west Malaysia 1984-1987.1984 - 1987年马来西亚西部肺结核原发性耐药性研究
Med J Malaysia. 1993 Jun;48(2):113-6.
8
[Biological properties of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in relation to sensitivity to antibacterial preparations].
Probl Tuberk. 1995(4):37-40.
9
Comparison of the resistance ratio and proportion methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.结核分枝杆菌抗菌药物敏感性试验中电阻比法与比例法的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2001 Oct;84(10):1467-76.
10
Susceptibility tests to second line drugs and re-treatment of tuberculosis revisiting early experiences.二线药物敏感性试验与结核病再治疗:回顾早期经验
Medicina (B Aires). 2007;67(3):231-7.