Cunha T M, Verri W A, Vivancos G G, Moreira I F, Reis S, Parada C A, Cunha F Q, Ferreira S H
Departamento de Farmacologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2004 Mar;37(3):401-7. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2004000300018. Epub 2004 Mar 3.
The aim of the present investigation was to describe and validate an electronic mechanical test for quantification of the intensity of inflammatory nociception in mice. The electronic pressure-meter test consists of inducing the animal hindpaw flexion reflex by poking the plantar region with a polypropylene pipette tip adapted to a hand-held force transducer. This method was compared to the classical von Frey filaments test in which pressure intensity is automatically recorded after the nociceptive hindpaw flexion reflex. The electronic pressure-meter and the von Frey filaments were used to detect time versus treatment interactions of carrageenin-induced hypernociception. In two separate experiments, the electronic pressure-meter was more sensitive than the von Frey filaments for the detection of the increase in nociception (hypernociception) induced by small doses of carrageenin (30 microg). The electronic pressure-meter detected the antinociceptive effect of non-steroidal drugs in a dose-dependent manner. Indomethacin administered intraperitoneally (1.8-15 mg/kg) or intraplantarly (30-300 microg/paw) prevented the hypersensitive effect of carrageenin (100 microg/paw). The electronic pressure-meter also detected the hypernociceptive effect of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2; 10-100 ng) in a dose-dependent manner. The hypernociceptive effect of PGE2 (100 ng) was blocked by dipyrone (160 and 320 microg/paw) but not by intraplantar administration of indomethacin (300 microg/paw). The present results validate the use of the electronic pressure-meter as more sensitive than the von Frey filaments in mice. Furthermore, it is an objective and quantitative nociceptive test for the evaluation of the peripheral antinociceptive effect of anti-inflammatory analgesic drugs, which inhibit prostaglandin synthesis (indomethacin) or directly block the ongoing hypernociception (dipyrone).
本研究的目的是描述并验证一种用于量化小鼠炎性伤害性感受强度的电子机械测试。电子压力计测试是通过用适配于手持式力传感器的聚丙烯移液管尖端戳刺动物足底区域来诱发动物后爪屈曲反射。该方法与经典的von Frey细丝测试进行了比较,在后者中,伤害性后爪屈曲反射后会自动记录压力强度。电子压力计和von Frey细丝用于检测角叉菜胶诱导的痛觉过敏的时间与治疗相互作用。在两个独立实验中,对于检测小剂量角叉菜胶(30微克)诱导的伤害性感受增加(痛觉过敏),电子压力计比von Frey细丝更敏感。电子压力计以剂量依赖性方式检测到非甾体类药物的抗伤害性感受作用。腹腔注射(1.8 - 15毫克/千克)或足底注射(30 - 300微克/爪)吲哚美辛可预防角叉菜胶(100微克/爪)的超敏作用。电子压力计还以剂量依赖性方式检测到前列腺素E2(PGE2;10 - 100纳克)的痛觉过敏作用。PGE2(100纳克)的痛觉过敏作用被安乃近(160和320微克/爪)阻断,但足底注射吲哚美辛(300微克/爪)未阻断。目前的结果证实,在小鼠中电子压力计比von Frey细丝更敏感。此外,它是一种客观且定量的伤害性感受测试,用于评估抑制前列腺素合成(吲哚美辛)或直接阻断持续痛觉过敏(安乃近)的抗炎镇痛药的外周抗伤害性感受作用。