• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于随机扩增多态性DNA(RAPD)分析的加纳70份黄肉芋(Xanthosoma sagittifolium, Linn, Schott)种质的遗传结构

Genetic structure of seventy cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium, Linn, Schott) accessions in Ghana based on RAPD.

作者信息

Offei S K, Asante I K, Danquah E Y

机构信息

Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Crop Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.

出版信息

Hereditas. 2004;140(2):123-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2004.01725.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1601-5223.2004.01725.x
PMID:15061789
Abstract

Seventy cocoyam accessions collected from the eastern and Volta regions of Ghana were studied using RAPD technique. Ten primers were used to study the genetic diversity and structure of the experimental material and a total of 120 different bands were detected. Levels of polymorphic fragments detected by the ten primers ranged from 69.2% to 100%. In the accessions from the eastern region, the mean observed and effective number of alleles per individual per population and mean Nei's gene diversity were 1.99+/-0.01, 1.53+/-0.12 and 0.312+/-0.05, respectively. Mean observed and effective number of alleles per individual per population and Nei's gene diversity were 1.76+/-0.17, 1.44+/-0.16 and 0.264+/-0.08, respectively for the accessions from the Volta region. Considering the entire collections, the mean observed and effective number of alleles per individual per population and Nei's gene diversity for primers were 1.99+/-0.02, 1.54+/-0.12 and 0.319+/-0.05, respectively. In terms of Nei's F-statistics in the subdivided populations for all primers, the overall gene diversity (Ht) ranged from 0.230 to 0.396 with a mean of 0.313+0.06, within sample gene diversity (Hs) ranged from 0.214 to 0.372 with a mean of 0.286+0.06, gene differentiation (Gst) ranged between 0.005 and 0.178 with a mean of 0.086. Geneflow estimate ranged between 2.309 and 99.500 with a mean of 5.314. The accessions grouped into three main clusters. Accession BD96/183 was the most diverse and may be incorporated into cocoyam breeding programs. The 70 accessions did not cluster into their distinct geographical regions suggesting that there may have been movement of germplasm across the two regions.

摘要

利用随机扩增多态性DNA(RAPD)技术对从加纳东部和沃尔特地区收集的70份芋种质进行了研究。使用10种引物来研究实验材料的遗传多样性和结构,共检测到120条不同的条带。10种引物检测到的多态性片段水平在69.2%至100%之间。在来自东部地区的种质中,每个群体中每个个体的平均观察等位基因数和有效等位基因数以及平均奈氏基因多样性分别为1.99±0.01、1.53±0.12和0.312±0.05。对于来自沃尔特地区的种质,每个群体中每个个体的平均观察等位基因数和有效等位基因数以及奈氏基因多样性分别为1.76±0.17、1.44±0.16和0.264±0.08。考虑到整个收集物,引物的每个群体中每个个体的平均观察等位基因数和有效等位基因数以及奈氏基因多样性分别为1.99±0.02、1.54±0.12和0.319±0.05。就所有引物在细分群体中的奈氏F统计量而言,总体基因多样性(Ht)在0.230至0.396之间,平均值为0.313±0.06,样本内基因多样性(Hs)在0.214至0.372之间,平均值为0.286±0.06,基因分化(Gst)在0.005至0.178之间,平均值为0.086。基因流估计值在2.309至99.500之间,平均值为5.314。这些种质分为三个主要聚类。种质BD96/183的多样性最高,可纳入芋育种计划。这70份种质并未聚类到其各自不同的地理区域,这表明两个地区之间可能存在种质流动。

相似文献

1
Genetic structure of seventy cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium, Linn, Schott) accessions in Ghana based on RAPD.基于随机扩增多态性DNA(RAPD)分析的加纳70份黄肉芋(Xanthosoma sagittifolium, Linn, Schott)种质的遗传结构
Hereditas. 2004;140(2):123-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2004.01725.x.
2
Assessment of genetic variation within Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) germplasm using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers.利用随机扩增多态性DNA标记评估印度芥菜(芸苔属芥菜种)种质内的遗传变异。
J Integr Plant Biol. 2008 Apr;50(4):385-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2007.00630.x.
3
Genetic diversity of Ethiopian cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium (L.) Schott) accessions as revealed by morphological traits and SSR markers.埃塞俄比亚芋(Xanthosoma sagittifolium (L.) Schott)种质资源的形态特征和 SSR 标记遗传多样性分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):e0245120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245120. eCollection 2021.
4
Genetic diversity within and among Lepidium draba populations from Eastern Anatolia based on RAPD analysis.基于 RAPD 分析的东安纳托利亚独行菜种群内和种群间的遗传多样性。
Biochem Genet. 2010 Aug;48(7-8):603-11. doi: 10.1007/s10528-010-9342-3. Epub 2010 May 23.
5
Genetic structure of Malus sieversii population from Xinjiang, China, revealed by SSR markers.SSR标记揭示的中国新疆塞威氏苹果种群的遗传结构
J Genet Genomics. 2007 Oct;34(10):947-55. doi: 10.1016/S1673-8527(07)60106-4.
6
Genetic diversity in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) landraces from Zimbabwe revealed by RAPD and SSR markers.津巴布韦野生西瓜地方品种的遗传多样性研究——RAPD 和 SSR 标记分析。
Hereditas. 2010 Aug;147(4):142-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2010.02165.x.
7
Efficiency of phenotypic and DNA markers for a genetic diversity study of alfalfa.用于苜蓿遗传多样性研究的表型和DNA标记的效率
Genetika. 2010 Nov;46(11):1493-9.
8
Genetic diversity of Picea asperata populations based on RAPDs.基于随机扩增多态性DNA(RAPD)的云杉种群遗传多样性研究
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2007 Jan;9(1):101-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-924455. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
9
[RAPD analysis for genetic diversity of Fagopyrum cymosum].[金荞麦遗传多样性的随机扩增多态性DNA分析]
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2009 Mar;34(6):660-3.
10
Evaluation of genetic diversity in Piper spp using RAPD and SRAP markers.利用RAPD和SRAP标记评估胡椒属植物的遗传多样性
Genet Mol Res. 2011 Nov 29;10(4):2934-43. doi: 10.4238/2011.November.29.4.

引用本文的文献

1
Complete chloroplast genome sequences of three aroideae species (Araceae): lights into selective pressure, marker development and phylogenetic relationships.三个天南星科物种(天南星科)的完整叶绿体基因组序列:选择性压力、标记开发和系统发育关系的启示。
BMC Genomics. 2022 Mar 19;23(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08400-3.
2
Utilizing cocoyam () for food and nutrition security: A review.利用芋属植物促进粮食和营养安全:综述
Food Sci Nutr. 2018 Mar 13;6(4):703-713. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.602. eCollection 2018 Jun.
3
Bioinformatics in Africa: The Rise of Ghana?
非洲的生物信息学:加纳的崛起?
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Sep 17;11(9):e1004308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004308. eCollection 2015 Sep.
4
Characterization of microsatellites in Xanthosoma sagittifolium (Araceae) and cross-amplification in related species.鉴定箭叶芋(天南星科)微卫星及其在相关物种中的交叉扩增。
Appl Plant Sci. 2014 Jun 4;2(6). doi: 10.3732/apps.1400027. eCollection 2014 Jun.