Steele James G, Sanders Anne E, Slade Gary D, Allen Patrick Finbarr, Lahti Satu, Nuttall Nigel, Spencer A John
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004 Apr;32(2):107-14. doi: 10.1111/j.0301-5661.2004.00131.x.
Age and loss of teeth can be expected to have a complex relationship with oral health-related quality of life. This study aimed to explain how age and tooth loss affect the impact of oral health on daily living using the short form, 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) on national population samples of dentate adults from the UK (1998 UK Adult Dental Health Survey) and Australia (1999 National Dental Telephone Interview Survey). After correcting for key covariables, increasing age was associated with better mean impact scores in both populations. Those aged 30-49 years in Australia showed the worst (highest) scores. In the UK, those aged under 30 showed the highest scores. In both countries, adults aged 70+ showed much better scores than the rest (P < 0.001). When corrected for age, the independent effect of tooth loss was that the worst scores were found where there were fewer than 17 natural teeth in the UK and fewer than 21 teeth in Australia. People with 25 or more teeth averaged much better scores than all other groups (P < 0.001), although there were differences in pattern between countries. When Australians were analysed by region of birth, the pattern of scores by tooth loss for British/Irish immigrants was strikingly similar to that for the UK sample. First-generation immigrants from elsewhere showed much worse overall scores and a profoundly different pattern to the Australian- and British-born groups. Age, number of teeth and cultural background are important variables influencing oral health-related quality of life.
年龄和牙齿缺失与口腔健康相关生活质量之间可能存在复杂的关系。本研究旨在利用14项简版口腔健康影响程度量表(OHIP - 14),解释年龄和牙齿缺失如何影响口腔健康对日常生活的影响,研究对象为来自英国(1998年英国成人牙齿健康调查)和澳大利亚(1999年全国牙齿电话访谈调查)的有牙成年人全国人口样本。在校正关键协变量后,年龄增长与两国人群中更好的平均影响得分相关。澳大利亚30 - 49岁的人群得分最差(最高)。在英国,30岁以下的人群得分最高。在两国,70岁及以上的成年人得分均比其他人群好得多(P < 0.001)。在校正年龄后,牙齿缺失的独立影响是,在英国天然牙少于17颗、在澳大利亚少于21颗的人群得分最差。拥有25颗及以上牙齿的人群平均得分比所有其他组都好得多(P < 0.001),尽管两国之间存在模式差异。当按出生地区分析澳大利亚人时,英国/爱尔兰移民牙齿缺失的得分模式与英国样本非常相似。来自其他地方的第一代移民总体得分要差得多,且与澳大利亚出生和英国出生的人群模式截然不同。年龄、牙齿数量和文化背景是影响口腔健康相关生活质量的重要变量。