Suppr超能文献

亚秒级“时间注意力”调节阿尔法节律。一项高分辨率脑电图研究。

Sub-second "temporal attention" modulates alpha rhythms. A high-resolution EEG study.

作者信息

Babiloni Claudio, Miniussi Carlo, Babiloni Fabio, Carducci Filippo, Cincotti Febo, Del Percio Claudio, Sirello Giulia, Fracassi Claudia, Nobre Anna C, Rossini Paolo Maria

机构信息

Dipartimento di Fisiologia Umana e Farmacologia, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy. claudio.babiloni@uniroma 1.it

出版信息

Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 May;19(3):259-68. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.010.

Abstract

In the present high-resolution electroencephalographic (EEG) study, event-related desynchronization/synchronization (ERD/ERS) of alpha rhythms was computed during an S1-S2 paradigm, in which a visual cue (S1) predicted a SHORT (600 ms) or LONG (1400 ms) foreperiod, preceding a visual go stimulus (S2) triggering right or left finger movement. Could orienting attention to a selective point in time influence the alpha rhythms as a function of the SHORT vs. LONG foreperiod? Stronger selective attentional modulations were predicted for the SHORT than LONG condition. EEG data from 54 channels were "depurated" from phase-locked visual evoked potentials and spatially enhanced by surface Laplacian estimation (i.e., final data analysis was conducted on 16 subjects having a sufficient number of artifact-free EEG single trials). Low-band alpha rhythms (about 6-10 Hz) were supposed to be related to anticipatory attentional processes, whereas high-band alpha rhythms (10-12 Hz) would indicate task-specific visuo-motor processes. Compared to the LONG condition (foreperiod), the SHORT condition induced a quicker and stronger ERS at low-band alpha rhythm (about 6-8 Hz) over midline and bilateral prefrontal, sensorimotor, and posterior parietal areas. In contrast, the concomitant high-band alpha (about 10-12 Hz) ERD/ERS showed no significant difference between the two conditions. In conclusion, temporal attention for a sub-second delay (800 ms) did modulate low-band alpha rhythm over large regions of both cortical hemispheres.

摘要

在当前这项高分辨率脑电图(EEG)研究中,在一个S1-S2范式期间计算了α节律的事件相关去同步化/同步化(ERD/ERS),其中一个视觉提示(S1)预测一个短(600毫秒)或长(1400毫秒)的前周期,在触发右或左手指运动的视觉启动刺激(S2)之前。将注意力定向到一个特定的时间点是否会根据短与长前周期的函数影响α节律?预计短条件下的选择性注意调制比长条件下更强。来自54个通道的EEG数据从锁相视觉诱发电位中“净化”,并通过表面拉普拉斯估计在空间上增强(即,对16名有足够数量无伪迹EEG单次试验的受试者进行最终数据分析)。低波段α节律(约6-10赫兹)被认为与预期注意过程有关,而高波段α节律(10-12赫兹)将指示特定任务的视觉运动过程。与长条件(前周期)相比,短条件在中线和双侧前额叶、感觉运动和顶叶后部区域诱导出更快更强的低波段α节律(约6-8赫兹)ERS。相反,伴随的高波段α(约10-12赫兹)ERD/ERS在两种条件之间没有显著差异。总之,对亚秒级延迟(800毫秒)的时间注意确实在两个大脑半球的大片区域调节了低波段α节律。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验