• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西罗莫司洗脱支架植入治疗多支冠状动脉疾病:即刻及中期结果

Treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: immediate and mid-term results.

作者信息

Orlic Dejan, Bonizzoni Erminio, Stankovic Goran, Airoldi Flavio, Chieffo Alaide, Corvaja Nicola, Sangiorgi Giuseppe, Ferraro Massimo, Briguori Carlo, Montorfano Matteo, Carlino Mauro, Colombo Antonio

机构信息

EMO, Centro Cuore Columbus Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Apr 7;43(7):1154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.052.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.052
PMID:15063422
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated clinical outcome after multivessel stenting with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in unselected lesions.

BACKGROUND

Safety and effectiveness of multivessel SES implantation is currently unknown.

METHODS

Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction [MI], and repeat revascularization) were analyzed at 30 days and at 6 months after multivessel SES implantation.

RESULTS

In 155 consecutive patients, 573 SES were implanted in 3.3 +/- 1.3 lesions per patient. At 30 days, the cumulative MACE rate was 10.3%: 7.1% patients developed a non-Q-wave MI, 1.9% developed a Q-wave MI, 0.6% died for non-cardiac reasons, and 0.6% had a repeat revascularization. Clinical follow-up was obtained in all 112 eligible patients treated for 359 lesions at a mean time of 6.5 +/- 2.2 months. The cumulative MACE rate was 22.3%: 3 (2.7%) deaths (1 for cardiac reasons), 4 (3.6%) MIs, target lesion revascularization (TLR) in 16 (14.3%) patients with 24 (6.7%) lesions. Target vessel revascularization was required in 18 (16.1%) patients due to TLR of lesions treated with SES or to disease progression (1.8% of patients). Cox regression analysis revealed total stent length per patient as the most powerful independent predictor of MACE. Overall stent thrombosis occurred in three (1.9%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Multivessel SES implantation can be safely performed on patients with complex coronary artery disease. The need for revascularization increases because of the cumulative effect of TLR on patients with multiple lesions.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了在未经选择的病变中使用西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)进行多支血管支架置入术后的临床结局。

背景

目前尚不清楚多支血管SES植入的安全性和有效性。

方法

在多支血管SES植入术后30天和6个月时分析主要不良心脏事件(MACE)(死亡、心肌梗死[MI]和再次血运重建)。

结果

在155例连续患者中,共植入573枚SES,每位患者植入3.3±1.3处病变。在30天时,累积MACE发生率为10.3%:7.1%的患者发生非Q波心肌梗死,1.9%的患者发生Q波心肌梗死,0.6%的患者因非心脏原因死亡,0.6%的患者进行了再次血运重建。在平均时间为6.5±2.2个月时,对所有112例接受359处病变治疗的符合条件患者进行了临床随访。累积MACE发生率为22.3%:3例(2.7%)死亡(1例因心脏原因),4例(3.6%)心肌梗死,16例(14.3%)患者的24处(6.7%)病变进行了靶病变血运重建(TLR)。由于SES治疗病变的TLR或疾病进展,18例(16.1%)患者需要进行靶血管血运重建(占患者的1.8%)。Cox回归分析显示每位患者的总支架长度是MACE最有力的独立预测因素。3例(1.9%)患者发生了总体支架血栓形成。

结论

多支血管SES植入术可安全地应用于复杂冠状动脉疾病患者。由于TLR对多病变患者的累积效应,血运重建的需求增加。

相似文献

1
Treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: immediate and mid-term results.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入治疗多支冠状动脉疾病:即刻及中期结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Apr 7;43(7):1154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.052.
2
Predictive factors of cardiac events after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of in-stent restenosis.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入治疗支架内再狭窄后心脏事件的预测因素。
Int J Cardiol. 2006 May 10;109(2):207-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.06.004. Epub 2005 Jul 1.
3
Outcome in the real-world of coronary high-risk intervention with drug-eluting stents (ORCHID) -- a single-center study comparing Cypher sirolimus-eluting with Taxus paclitaxel-eluting stents.药物洗脱支架用于冠状动脉高危干预的真实世界结果(ORCHID)——一项比较西罗莫司洗脱Cypher支架与紫杉醇洗脱Taxus支架的单中心研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Nov;68(5):663-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20741.
4
Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for treatment of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions: long-term outcome and predictors of adverse cardiac events.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Sep;70(3):368-73. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21127.
5
Impact of three or more versus a single sirolimus-eluting stent on outcomes in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention.
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Mar 1;97(5):606-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.09.097. Epub 2006 Jan 6.
6
Prospective native coronary artery stenosis treated with sirolimus-eluting stent (ONASSIS) registry--acute results and mid-term outcomes: a single-center experience.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2005 Aug;17(8):401-5.
7
Acute and intermediate-term procedural results using cypher stenting to treat multi-vessel coronary artery disease.
Int J Cardiovasc Intervent. 2005;7(3):122-5. doi: 10.1080/14628840500306875.
8
Incidence and clinical impact of coronary stent fracture after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入术后冠状动脉支架断裂的发生率及临床影响
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Feb 15;69(3):380-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20950.
9
Elective sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for multivessel disease involving significant LAD stenosis: one-year clinical outcomes of 99 consecutive patients--the Rotterdam experience.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004 Sep;63(1):57-60. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20073.
10
Early outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: insights from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入急性冠状动脉综合征患者后的早期转归:来自鹿特丹心脏病医院西罗莫司洗脱支架评估(RESEARCH)注册研究的见解
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Jun 4;41(11):2093-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00429-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between the total length of the stents and patients' quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后支架总长度与患者生活质量的关系。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jul 15;8(7):11435-41. eCollection 2015.
2
Evaluation of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing dual vessel percutaneous coronary intervention using sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system in India.在印度使用西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统进行双支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者的临床结果评估。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Feb;9(2):OC05-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/10766.5525. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
3
The practicing physician's current perspective on therapeutic options in coronary artery disease.
执业医师对冠状动脉疾病治疗选择的当前观点。
Neth Heart J. 2005 Aug;13(7-8):274-279.
4
Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable angina: a common approach? Lessons learned from the EHS PCI registry.稳定型心绞痛患者的多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一种常见方法?从EHS PCI注册研究中获得的经验教训
Heart Vessels. 2012 Sep;27(5):453-9. doi: 10.1007/s00380-011-0207-4. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
5
Facts and principles learned at the 32nd annual Williamsburg Conference on Heart Disease.在第32届威廉斯堡心脏病年会上学到的事实和原则。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2005 Apr;18(2):141-56. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2005.11928054.
6
Contemporary Use of Drug-eluting Stents.
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2005 May;7(1):35-46. doi: 10.1007/s11936-005-0004-4.
7
[When are drug-eluting stents effective? A critical analysis of the presently available data].药物洗脱支架何时有效?对现有数据的批判性分析
Z Kardiol. 2004 Sep;93(9):649-63. doi: 10.1007/s00392-004-0143-8.