• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for treatment of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions: long-term outcome and predictors of adverse cardiac events.

作者信息

Lee Cheol Whan, Tan Chong-Hiok, Suh Jon, Lee Se-Whan, Park Duk-Woo, Lee Seung-Whan, Kim Young-Hak, Hong Myeong-Ki, Kim Jae-Joong, Park Seong-Wook, Park Seung-Jung

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Sep;70(3):368-73. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21127.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.21127
PMID:17722041
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Acute and long-term results after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) disease were evaluated.

BACKGROUND

Although SES has been used increasingly for the treatment of LAD disease, data regarding their safety and efficacy in a real-world population are limited.

METHODS

We investigate the short- and long-term results in 966 patients who underwent SES implantation for stenosis of proximal LAD.

RESULTS

The procedural success rate was 97.6%, and procedural non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) rate was 14.5%. In-hospital major complications occurred in five patients (0.5%), including three deaths and two Q-wave MIs. During follow-up (20.4 +/- 8.9 months), there were 16 deaths (1.7%; 10 cardiac, 6 noncardiac), 2 Q-wave MIs, and 22 target lesion revascularizations (2.3%). Late stent thrombosis occurred in two patients (0.2%), 14 and 23 months after the procedure. The event-free survival rates for cardiac death/Q-wave MI were 98.6% +/- 0.4% at 1 year and 97.8% +/- 0.6% at 2 years. The cumulative probabilities of survival without major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were 96.7% +/- 0.6% at 1 year and 95.4% +/- 0.8% at 2 years. In multivariate analysis, stented length (HR 1.04, 95%CI 1.01-1.07, P = 0.009) and infarct-related artery (HR 5.18, 95%CI 1.09-24.64, P = 0.039) were independently related to cardiac death/Q-wave MI. In addition, stented length (HR 1.04, 95%CI 1.02-1.06, P < 0.001) and left ventricular dysfunction (HR 2.66, 95%CI 1.07-6.63, P = 0.036) were significant independent predictors of MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

SES implantation for proximal LAD disease appears safe and effective in a real-world population, and the independent predictors of MACE included stented length and left ventricular dysfunction.

摘要

相似文献

1
Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for treatment of proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions: long-term outcome and predictors of adverse cardiac events.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Sep;70(3):368-73. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21127.
2
Treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease with sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: immediate and mid-term results.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入治疗多支冠状动脉疾病:即刻及中期结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Apr 7;43(7):1154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.052.
3
Immediate and long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: comparison with bare-metal stent implantation.药物洗脱支架植入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的近期和长期疗效:与裸金属支架植入的比较。
Am Heart J. 2008 Mar;155(3):553-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.10.030.
4
Effectiveness of drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.药物洗脱支架植入术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄患者的疗效
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Mar 15;101(6):801-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.10.052. Epub 2008 Jan 18.
5
Factors predictive of cardiac events and restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in small coronary arteries.小冠状动脉中雷帕霉素洗脱支架植入术后心脏事件和再狭窄的预测因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 May 1;69(6):821-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21019.
6
Sirolimus-eluting stents versus Paclitaxel-eluting stents in the treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus.西罗莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病的对比研究
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jul 15;98(2):187-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.074. Epub 2006 May 19.
7
Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus- Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: 5-Year Results From SORT OUT IV.依维莫司洗脱支架与西罗莫司洗脱支架的安全性和疗效:SORT OUT IV 研究 5 年结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 23;67(7):751-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.051.
8
Clinical and angiographic outcomes after placement of multiple overlapping drug-eluting stents in diffuse coronary lesions.弥漫性冠状动脉病变中多个重叠药物洗脱支架置入后的临床和血管造影结果。
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Oct 1;98(7):918-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.05.011. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
9
Impact of three or more versus a single sirolimus-eluting stent on outcomes in patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention.
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Mar 1;97(5):606-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.09.097. Epub 2006 Jan 6.
10
Impact of sirolimus-eluting and Paclitaxel-eluting stents on outcome in patients with diabetes mellitus and stenting in more than one coronary artery.西罗莫司洗脱支架和紫杉醇洗脱支架对糖尿病患者及多支冠状动脉置入支架患者预后的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Aug 1;98(3):362-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.104. Epub 2006 Jun 12.