Zikorus Arthur W, Mirizzi Michael S
Research and Development Laboratory of VNUS Medical Technologies, San Jose, CA 95131, USA.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2004 Mar-Apr;38(2):167-74. doi: 10.1177/153857440403800209.
Endovenous occlusion of the greater saphenous vein with radiofrequency (RF) energy has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for saphenofemoral reflux. Operating parameters initially developed for the VNUS Closure system were selected in order to provide sufficient energy to controllably and transmurally heat the vein wall to cause collagen contraction and destruction of the vein wall while limiting the degree of perivascular heating. Procedural advances, such as ultrasound-guided tumescent infiltration along the course of the vein to be treated, have provided an added level of thermal protection to the perivenous tissue during the application of RF energy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of raising the setpoint temperature from 85 degrees C to 90 degrees C while doubling the pullback speed from 3 to 6 cm/minute on vein adventitial temperature. An in vitro simulation of a peripheral vein surrounded by body tissue was created by fixing freshly excised bovine veins in beefsteak kept moist by normal saline. A VNUS RF generator, in conjunction with a VNUS Closure catheter, delivered temperature-controlled RF energy to the bovine vein intima. Adventitial temperatures were recorded as the catheter was withdrawn and peak temperatures from 4 treatment groups were analyzed. The mean peak adventitial temperatures for the groups in which the adventitia was lightly bathed in saline were 64.4 degrees C and 64.9 degrees C with a setpoint temperature of 85 degrees C at a pullback speed of 3 cm/minute and 90 degrees C at a pullback speed of 6 cm/minute, respectively. The mean peak adventitial temperatures for the groups in which the adventitia was bathed in a 2.0 mm layer of saline were 51.3 degrees C and 47.7 degrees C with a setpoint temperature of 85 degrees C at a pullback speed of 3 cm/minute and 90 degrees C at a pullback speed of 6 cm/minute, respectively. Temperature-controlled radiofrequency occlusion of the saphenous vein, performed using an intimal setpoint temperature of 90 degrees C and double the pullback speed of the historical VNUS Closure treatment (6 vs 3 cm/minute), produced comparable temperatures at the adventitial surface in an in vitro model. The addition of a 2.0 mm layer of saline significantly reduced the peak adventitial temperatures.
已证明,利用射频(RF)能量对大隐静脉进行腔内闭塞是治疗隐股静脉反流的一种安全有效的方法。最初为VNUS闭合系统开发的操作参数是为了提供足够的能量,以可控地、经壁加热静脉壁,使胶原蛋白收缩并破坏静脉壁,同时限制血管周围加热的程度。一些操作上的进展,如沿待治疗静脉行程进行超声引导下的肿胀浸润,在应用射频能量期间为静脉周围组织提供了更高水平的热保护。本研究的目的是评估将设定温度从85摄氏度提高到90摄氏度,同时将回撤速度从3厘米/分钟提高一倍至6厘米/分钟对静脉外膜温度的影响。通过将新鲜切除的牛静脉固定在由生理盐水保持湿润的牛排中,创建了一个被身体组织包围的外周静脉的体外模拟模型。一台VNUS射频发生器与一根VNUS闭合导管相结合,将温度可控的射频能量输送到牛静脉内膜。在导管回撤时记录外膜温度,并分析4个治疗组的峰值温度。在外膜轻度浸于盐水中的组中,当设定温度为85摄氏度、回撤速度为3厘米/分钟时,平均峰值外膜温度为64.4摄氏度;当设定温度为90摄氏度、回撤速度为6厘米/分钟时,平均峰值外膜温度为64.9摄氏度。在外膜浸于2.0毫米厚盐水层的组中,当设定温度为85摄氏度、回撤速度为3厘米/分钟时,平均峰值外膜温度为51.3摄氏度;当设定温度为90摄氏度、回撤速度为6厘米/分钟时,平均峰值外膜温度为47.7摄氏度。在体外模型中,使用90摄氏度的内膜设定温度和将历史VNUS闭合治疗的回撤速度提高一倍(6厘米/分钟对3厘米/分钟)进行温度可控的射频闭塞大隐静脉,在外膜表面产生了相当的温度。添加2.0毫米厚的盐水层显著降低了峰值外膜温度。