Wilf-Miron Rachel, Shemer Joshua
Israeli Center for Technology Assessment in Health Care, Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Tel Hashomer.
Harefuah. 2004 Mar;143(3):170-6, 248.
The recent concern regarding the quality of healthcare services is partly due to the empowerment of health consumers, cost containment measures that may compromise quality, increased complexity of the medical practice and the accelerated growth of data on the magnitude and extent of quality problems. The framework of the delivery of health services, including quality parameters, differs fundamentally in the community as opposed to the hospital setting. In the community, the episode of care lacks geographic and temporal boundaries, and is divided among different facilities and caregivers. Hence, the healthcare systems lack control over the management of care. In the solo practice, the physician lacks the opportunity to discuss and share medical decisions with his/her peers and physician's reimbursement does not encourage him/her to invest time and effort in the provision of quality care. Furthermore, in the community setting, the patient is expected to take responsibility for compliance to the therapeutic regimen, a condition that may frequently interfere with regular life routines. Therefore, quality promotion should embody the "quality triangle" encompassing patients, caregivers, the healthcare system and appropriate interfaces. Ideally, the voice of the health consumer should be an integral consideration in the design of health policy, care should be patient-centered and physician reimbursement should reflect the quality of care provided. In addition, the design of the healthcare system information technology in supporting decision-making and training "quality leaders" to facilitate quality improvement programs. Consequently, it is pivotal to nurture agreement among policy-makers, patients and caregivers as to the essence of the dilemma: "What is quality in community care?" Meanwhile, we may suggest a primordial definition to community-based health care quality management: An ongoing multidisciplinary effort to identify and respond to the needs of patients, by providing systemic infrastructure that will support the caregivers and help in achieving better outcomes in the six basic dimensions of quality care-safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable and patient-centered. In conclusion, in light of the medical activities conducted in the community, and the prevalent and ever-growing shortage of resources, there is a need to integrate efforts to develop and implement both unique tools and strategies to manage quality in community-based health services.
近期对医疗服务质量的关注,部分原因在于健康消费者的赋权、可能影响质量的成本控制措施、医疗实践日益复杂以及有关质量问题规模和程度的数据加速增长。与医院环境相比,社区卫生服务的提供框架,包括质量参数,存在根本差异。在社区中,护理过程缺乏地理和时间界限,且分散在不同机构和护理人员之间。因此,医疗系统对护理管理缺乏控制。在个体行医中,医生缺乏与同行讨论和分享医疗决策的机会,而且医生的报销政策也不鼓励其投入时间和精力提供高质量护理。此外,在社区环境中,患者需自行负责遵守治疗方案,这一情况可能经常干扰日常生活。因此,质量提升应体现涵盖患者、护理人员、医疗系统及适当接口的“质量三角”。理想情况下,健康消费者的声音应成为卫生政策设计的一个整体考量因素,护理应以患者为中心,医生报销应反映所提供护理的质量。此外,医疗系统信息技术的设计应支持决策制定,并培养“质量领导者”以推动质量改进计划。因此,至关重要的是,政策制定者、患者和护理人员就这一困境的本质达成共识:“社区护理中的质量是什么?” 同时,我们可为基于社区的医疗质量管理提出一个基本定义:通过提供支持护理人员并有助于在安全、及时、有效、高效、公平和以患者为中心这六个质量护理基本维度上取得更好结果的系统基础设施,持续进行多学科努力,以识别并满足患者需求。总之,鉴于社区开展的医疗活动以及普遍且日益严重的资源短缺情况,有必要整合各方力量,开发并实施独特的工具和策略,以管理基于社区的卫生服务质量。