• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌筛查指南的依从性:综述

Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review.

作者信息

Subramanian Sujha, Klosterman Michelle, Amonkar Mayur M, Hunt Timothy L

机构信息

RTI, International, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2004 May;38(5):536-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.011.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.011
PMID:15066356
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review screening rates and factors impacting patient utilization of colorectal cancer screening tests.

METHODS

We searched Medline, CancerLit, and PsycInfo for articles on colorectal cancer screening adherence. US studies on average-risk individuals were reviewed to identify: (1) utilization/adherence rates, (2) predictors of patient adherence, (3) correlation between long-term adherence and type of test selected, (4) predictors of physician recommendation of screening tests, and (5) patterns in the type of test recommended by physicians.

RESULTS

In 2000, only 34% of the US population obtained screening within recommended time frames (fecal occult blood test annually, flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, or colonoscopy every 10 years). Positive attitude toward screening and physician recommendation result in high adherence while fear of finding cancer and the belief that cancer is fatal result in low adherence. Physician specialty impacts the type of test recommended, while perceived lack of patient adherence is not a consistent barrier to recommending screening tests. Matching individuals with their choice of screening test and newer technology, such as virtual colonoscopy, may help increase adherence.

CONCLUSION

Additional studies are required on differences in adherence between tests, whether patient preferences impact adherence, and how the physician-patient relationship can be fostered to increase adherence.

摘要

目的

回顾结直肠癌筛查率以及影响患者进行结直肠癌筛查检测的因素。

方法

我们在医学数据库(Medline)、癌症文献数据库(CancerLit)和心理学文摘数据库(PsycInfo)中搜索有关结直肠癌筛查依从性的文章。对美国针对平均风险个体的研究进行回顾,以确定:(1)利用率/依从率;(2)患者依从性的预测因素;(3)长期依从性与所选检测类型之间的相关性;(4)医生推荐筛查检测的预测因素;(5)医生推荐的检测类型模式。

结果

2000年,只有34%的美国人口在推荐的时间范围内进行了筛查(每年进行粪便潜血检测,每5年进行一次乙状结肠镜检查,或每10年进行一次结肠镜检查)。对筛查持积极态度和医生的推荐会导致高依从性,而对发现癌症的恐惧以及认为癌症是致命的信念会导致低依从性。医生的专业会影响推荐的检测类型,而认为患者缺乏依从性并非推荐筛查检测的一贯障碍。使个体与他们选择的筛查检测及新技术(如虚拟结肠镜检查)相匹配,可能有助于提高依从性。

结论

需要进一步研究不同检测之间依从性的差异、患者偏好是否影响依从性以及如何促进医患关系以提高依从性。

相似文献

1
Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review.结直肠癌筛查指南的依从性:综述
Prev Med. 2004 May;38(5):536-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.011.
2
Taishotoyama Symposium Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: economics, capacity and adherence.太白山研讨会:结直肠癌筛查的障碍——经济学、能力与依从性
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Dec;23 Suppl 2:S198-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05556.x.
3
Utilization of colorectal cancer screening tests: a 1997 survey of Massachusetts internists.结直肠癌筛查测试的应用:1997年对马萨诸塞州内科医生的一项调查。
Prev Med. 2001 Nov;33(5):381-91. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2001.0903.
4
New screening guidelines for colorectal cancer: a practical guide for the primary care physician.结直肠癌新筛查指南:基层医疗医生实用指南。
Prim Care. 2009 Sep;36(3):575-602. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2009.04.009.
5
Colorectal cancer screening: do we practice what we preach?结直肠癌筛查:我们言行一致吗?
Surg Innov. 2006 Jun;13(2):81-5. doi: 10.1177/1553350606290163.
6
Screening for colorectal cancer on the front line.一线结直肠癌筛查
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Apr;98(4):915-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07360.x.
7
Colorectal cancer screening: recommendations and guideline adherence by physicians from digestive endoscopy centers in the Lazio region, Italy.结直肠癌筛查:意大利拉齐奥地区消化内镜中心医生的建议与指南遵循情况
Prev Med. 2006 Sep;43(3):183-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.05.002. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
8
Many participants in fecal occult blood test population screening have a higher-than-average risk for colorectal cancer.许多参与粪便潜血试验人群筛查的人患结直肠癌的风险高于平均水平。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Oct;18(10):1079-83. doi: 10.1097/01.meg.0000231754.35340.fa.
9
Predictors of stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查采用阶段的预测因素。
Prev Med. 2000 Oct;31(4):410-6. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0729.
10
Patients' anxiety and expectations: how they influence family physicians' decisions to order cancer screening tests.患者的焦虑与期望:它们如何影响家庭医生开具癌症筛查检查的决定。
Can Fam Physician. 2005 Dec;51(12):1658-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Colorectal cancer: local results and significance in Hungary.结直肠癌:匈牙利的局部结果及意义
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Dec 31;15(6):2552-2577. doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-318. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
2
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies Using Active Learning and Monte Carlo Simulation.基于主动学习和蒙特卡罗模拟的结直肠癌筛查策略的成本效益分析。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):554-571. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241258224. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
3
Bibliometric and visualization analysis of risk management in the doctor-patient relationship: A systematic quantitative literature review.
基于文献计量学的医患关系风险管理研究可视化分析: 系统定量文献综述
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Apr 19;103(16):e37807. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037807.
4
Longitudinal adherence to surveillance for late effects of cancer treatment: a population-based study of adult survivors of childhood cancer.癌症治疗晚期效应监测的纵向依从性:一项基于人群的儿童癌症成年幸存者研究。
CMAJ. 2024 Mar 10;196(9):E282-E294. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.231358.
5
Prevalence and predictors of colorectal cancer screening in the United States: evidence from the HINTS database 2018 to 2020.美国结直肠癌筛查的流行率和预测因素:来自 2018 年至 2020 年 HINTS 数据库的证据。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Feb;35(2):335-345. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01795-8. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
6
Assessing the methodological strengths and limitations of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) guidelines: a critical appraisal using AGREE II and AGREE-REX tool.评估西班牙肿瘤内科学会(SEOM)指南的方法学优势和局限性:使用 AGREE II 和 AGREE-REX 工具进行批判性评估。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Jan;26(1):85-97. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03219-0. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
7
Characteristics and impact of interventions to support healthcare providers' compliance with guideline recommendations for breast cancer: a systematic literature review.支持医疗保健提供者遵守乳腺癌指南推荐的干预措施的特征和影响:系统文献回顾。
Implement Sci. 2023 May 22;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01267-2.
8
MALDI-TOF/MS Analysis of Non-Invasive Human Urine and Saliva Samples for the Identification of New Cancer Biomarkers.基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱分析非侵入性人体尿液和唾液样本用于鉴定新的癌症生物标志物。
Molecules. 2022 Mar 16;27(6):1925. doi: 10.3390/molecules27061925.
9
A non-invasive method for concurrent detection of early-stage women-specific cancers.一种用于同时检测早期女性特有的癌症的非侵入性方法。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 10;12(1):2301. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06274-9.
10
Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening intent and uptake among adult Non-Hispanic Black men.成年非西班牙裔黑人男性中与结直肠癌筛查意愿及接受情况相关的因素。
Am J Cancer Res. 2021 Dec 15;11(12):6200-6213. eCollection 2021.