Woods A, Collier J, Kendrick D, Watts K, Dewey M, Illingworth R
Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, UK.
Inj Prev. 2004 Apr;10(2):83-7. doi: 10.1136/ip.2003.003475.
To evaluate the effectiveness of injury prevention training.
Cluster randomised controlled trial.
Primary care facilities in the East Midlands area of the United Kingdom.
Midwives and health visitors.
Evidence based training session on the risks associated with baby walkers.
The primary outcome measures were knowledge of baby walker use and walker related injury, attitudes towards walkers and towards walker education, and practices relating to walker health education.
Trained midwives and health visitors had greater knowledge of the risks associated with baby walkers than untrained midwives and health visitors (difference between the means 0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12 to 0.33). Trained health visitors had more negative attitudes to baby walkers (difference between the means 0.35; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.59) and more positive attitudes towards baby walker health education (difference between the means 0.31; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.62) than untrained health visitors. Midwives who had been trained were more likely to discuss baby walkers in the antenatal period than those who were not trained (odds ratio 9.92; 95% CI 2.02 to 48.83).
Injury prevention training was associated with increased knowledge, more negative attitudes towards walkers, and more positive attitudes towards walker education. Trained midwives were more likely to give advice antenatally. Training did not impact on other practices. Larger trials are required to assess the impact of training on parental safety behaviours, the adoption of safety practices, and injury reduction.
评估预防伤害培训的效果。
整群随机对照试验。
英国东米德兰兹地区的初级保健机构。
助产士和健康访视员。
关于婴儿学步车相关风险的循证培训课程。
主要结局指标包括对婴儿学步车使用及与学步车相关伤害的知识、对学步车及学步车教育的态度,以及与学步车健康教育相关的实践。
接受培训的助产士和健康访视员比未接受培训的助产士和健康访视员对婴儿学步车相关风险有更多了解(均值差异为0.22;95%置信区间(CI)为0.12至0.33)。与未接受培训的健康访视员相比,接受培训的健康访视员对婴儿学步车持更消极态度(均值差异为0.35;95%CI为0.10至0.59),对婴儿学步车健康教育持更积极态度(均值差异为0.31;95%CI为0.00至0.62)。接受培训的助产士比未接受培训的助产士在产前更有可能讨论婴儿学步车(优势比为9.92;95%CI为2.02至48.83)。
预防伤害培训与知识增加、对学步车更消极的态度以及对学步车教育更积极的态度相关。接受培训的助产士在产前更有可能提供建议。培训未对其他实践产生影响。需要进行更大规模的试验来评估培训对父母安全行为、安全实践的采用以及伤害减少的影响。