Castaldo Pasqualina, Stefanoni Patrizia, Miceli Francesco, Coppola Giangennaro, Del Giudice Emanuele Miraglia, Bellini Giulia, Pascotto Antonio, Trudell James R, Harrison Neil L, Annunziato Lucio, Taglialatela Maurizio
Division of Pharmacology, Department of Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
J Biol Chem. 2004 Jun 11;279(24):25598-604. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311021200. Epub 2004 Apr 5.
In this study, we have compared the functional consequences of three mutations (R218Q, V260M, and Q266H) in the alpha(1) subunit of the glycine receptor (GlyRA1) causing hyperekplexia, an inherited neurological channelopathy. In HEK-293 cells, the agonist EC(50s) for glycine-activated Cl(-) currents were increased from 26 microm in wtGlyRA1, to 5747, 135, and 129 microm in R218Q, V260M, and Q266H GlyRA1 channels, respectively. Cl(-) currents elicited by beta-alanine and taurine, which behave as agonists at wtGlyRA1, were decreased in V260M and Q266H mutant receptors and virtually abolished in GlyRA1 R218Q receptors. Gly-gated Cl(-) currents were similarly antagonized by low concentrations of strychnine in both wild-type (wt) and R218Q GlyRA1 channels, suggesting that the Arg-218 residue plays a crucial role in GlyRA1 channel gating, with only minor effects on the agonist/antagonist binding site, a hypothesis supported by our molecular model of the GlyRA1 subunit. The R218Q mutation, but not the V260M or the Q266H mutation, caused a marked decrease of receptor subunit expression both in total cell lysates and in isolated plasma membrane proteins. This decreased expression does not seem to explain the reduced agonist sensitivity of GlyRA1 R218Q channels since no difference in the apparent sensitivity to glycine or taurine was observed when wtGlyRA1 receptors were expressed at levels comparable with those of R218Q mutant receptors. In conclusion, multiple mechanisms may explain the dramatic decrease in GlyR function caused by the R218Q mutation, possibly providing the molecular basis for its association with a more severe clinical phenotype.
在本研究中,我们比较了甘氨酸受体α(1)亚基(GlyRA1)中导致惊跳症(一种遗传性神经通道病)的三种突变(R218Q、V260M和Q266H)的功能后果。在HEK-293细胞中,甘氨酸激活的Cl(-)电流的激动剂EC(50s)从野生型GlyRA1中的26微摩尔增加到R218Q、V260M和Q266H GlyRA1通道中的5747、135和129微摩尔。在野生型GlyRA1中表现为激动剂的β-丙氨酸和牛磺酸引发的Cl(-)电流在V260M和Q266H突变受体中降低,而在GlyRA1 R218Q受体中几乎完全消失。在野生型(wt)和R218Q GlyRA1通道中,低浓度的士的宁对甘氨酸门控的Cl(-)电流具有类似的拮抗作用,这表明精氨酸-218残基在GlyRA1通道门控中起关键作用,而对激动剂/拮抗剂结合位点的影响较小,我们的GlyRA1亚基分子模型支持这一假设。R218Q突变而非V260M或Q266H突变导致总细胞裂解物和分离的质膜蛋白中受体亚基表达显著降低。这种表达降低似乎并不能解释GlyRA1 R218Q通道激动剂敏感性降低的原因,因为当野生型GlyRA1受体以与R218Q突变受体相当的水平表达时,未观察到对甘氨酸或牛磺酸的表观敏感性存在差异。总之,多种机制可能解释了由R218Q突变导致的GlyR功能的显著降低,这可能为其与更严重临床表型的关联提供分子基础。