Suppr超能文献

关节镜下肩关节前路稳定术后的盂肱关节病

Glenohumeral arthropathy after arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization.

作者信息

Rhee Yong Girl, Lee Dong-Hun, Chun In Ho, Bae Sung Chul

机构信息

Shoulder & Elbow Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2004 Apr;20(4):402-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.027.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We present 5 cases of iatrogenic arthropathy after arthroscopic Bankart reconstruction using a metallic suture anchor.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Five patients with pain and crepitus on motion were referred to our institution for further evaluation of the previous procedure on anterior shoulder instability. Screw-type metallic suture anchors were used in all cases. All patients were men, with an average age of 23 years (range, 21 to 26). Surgical records on previous procedure were reviewed, and the clinical symptoms were evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and the Rowe scoring system. The secondary surgery for each patient was performed at an average of 12 months (range, 7 to 20) after the initial arthroscopic stabilization, except in one patient who wanted to postpone the revision surgery.

RESULTS

Protrusion of the anchor tip was seen in all and chondral defects in the humeral head with some degree of synovitis were also seen. Slight differences between preoperative and postoperative pain were seen, but almost no improvement in function, including range of motion, stability, and average Rowe score were seen after the second procedure. Patients who underwent revision surgery were dissatisfied with the final outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful attention should be paid when using a metallic suture anchor. A secure, buried placement of the anchor is required in arthroscopic Bankart reconstruction. Poorly placed suture anchors may damage the glenohumeral joint, and if these are not corrected either at arthroscopic surgery or shortly after, the results can be suboptimal. If a patient complains of unusual mechanical symptoms after using anchors, radiographs should be performed. This kind of serious complication can be discovered earlier to prevent the severe destruction of the glenohumeral joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

摘要

目的

我们报告5例使用金属缝合锚钉进行关节镜下Bankart重建术后发生医源性关节病的病例。

研究类型

回顾性病例系列研究。

方法

5例运动时出现疼痛和弹响的患者被转至我院,以进一步评估先前针对肩关节前不稳定所做的手术。所有病例均使用了螺旋型金属缝合锚钉。所有患者均为男性,平均年龄23岁(范围21至26岁)。回顾了先前手术的记录,并使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、简单肩关节测试(SST)和Rowe评分系统评估临床症状。除1例希望推迟翻修手术的患者外,每位患者的二次手术平均在初次关节镜稳定术后12个月(范围7至20个月)进行。

结果

所有病例均可见锚钉尖端突出,肱骨头有软骨缺损并伴有一定程度的滑膜炎。术前和术后疼痛有轻微差异,但二次手术后功能几乎没有改善,包括活动范围、稳定性和平均Rowe评分。接受翻修手术的患者对最终结果不满意。

结论

使用金属缝合锚钉时应格外小心。在关节镜下Bankart重建中,需要将锚钉安全地埋入。缝合锚钉放置不当可能会损伤肩肱关节,如果在关节镜手术时或术后不久未予纠正,结果可能不理想。如果患者在使用锚钉后出现异常机械症状,应进行X线检查。这种严重并发症可以更早发现,以防止肩肱关节的严重破坏。

证据级别

IV级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验