Suppr超能文献

茶碱与哌甲酯治疗儿童及青少年注意力缺陷多动障碍的疗效比较:一项双盲随机试验的初步研究

Efficacy of theophylline compared to methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a pilot double-blind randomized trial.

作者信息

Mohammadi M R, Kashani L, Akhondzadeh S, Izadian E S, Ohadinia S

机构信息

Psychiatric Research Center, Roozbeh Psychiatric Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2004 Apr;29(2):139-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2004.00545.x.

Abstract

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common disorder of childhood that affects 3-6% of school children. Conventional stimulant medications are recognized as useful symptomatic treatments by both specialists and parents. Nevertheless, approximately 30% of ADHD children treated with them do not respond adequately or cannot tolerate the associated adverse effects. Such difficulties highlight the need for alternative, safe and effective medications in the treatment of this disorder. Theophylline is a psychomotor stimulant most widely used as a broncodilator. Purinergic modulation may be therapeutically beneficial in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. We hypothesized that theophylline would be beneficial for the treatment of ADHD and report results of a trial of theophylline compared with methylphenidate for the treatment of ADHD. A total of 32 children with ADHD as defined by DSM IV were randomized to theophylline and methylphenidate dosed on an age and weight-adjusted basis at 4 mg/kg/day (under 12 years) and 3 mg/kg/day theophylline (over 12 years) (group 1) and 1 mg/kg/day methylphenidate (group 2) for a 6-week double-blind and randomized clinical trial. The principal measure of the outcome was the Teacher and Parent ADHD Rating Scale. Patients were assessed by a child psychiatrist, at baseline and at 14, 28 and 42 days after start of the medication. No significant differences were observed between theophylline and methylphenidate on the Parent and Teacher Rating Scale scores over the trial (t = 0.49, d.f. = 24 P = 0.62 and t = 0.19, d.f. = 24 P = 0.54 respectively). Although the number of dropouts in the methylphenidate group was higher than the theophylline group, there was no significant difference between the two protocols in terms of the dropouts. In addition, headaches were observed more often in the methylphenidate group. The results suggest that theophylline may be a useful for the treatment of ADHD. In addition, a tolerable side-effect profile is one of the advantages of theophylline in the treatment of ADHD. Nevertheless, our study is small and our results would need to be confirmed in a larger study.

摘要

注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是一种常见的儿童疾病,影响3%至6%的在校儿童。传统的兴奋剂药物被专家和家长公认为有效的对症治疗方法。然而,接受此类药物治疗的ADHD儿童中,约有30%反应不佳或无法耐受相关的不良反应。这些困难凸显了在治疗该疾病时需要使用替代的、安全有效的药物。茶碱是一种最广泛用作支气管扩张剂的精神运动兴奋剂。嘌呤能调节在精神疾病治疗中可能具有治疗益处。我们假设茶碱对ADHD的治疗有益,并报告了一项将茶碱与哌甲酯用于治疗ADHD的试验结果。共有32名符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)定义的ADHD儿童被随机分为两组,一组给予按年龄和体重调整剂量的茶碱,12岁以下儿童为4mg/kg/天,12岁以上儿童为3mg/kg/天(第1组),另一组给予1mg/kg/天的哌甲酯(第2组),进行为期6周的双盲随机临床试验。主要的疗效指标是教师和家长ADHD评定量表。在基线以及开始用药后的第14、28和42天,由儿童精神科医生对患者进行评估。在整个试验过程中,茶碱组和哌甲酯组在家长和教师评定量表得分上未观察到显著差异(分别为t = 0.49,自由度 = 24,P = 0.62;t = 0.19,自由度 = 24,P = 0.54)。虽然哌甲酯组的退出人数高于茶碱组,但在退出方面,两种方案之间没有显著差异。此外,哌甲酯组中头痛的发生率更高。结果表明,茶碱可能对ADHD的治疗有用。此外,可耐受的副作用是茶碱治疗ADHD的优势之一。然而,我们的研究规模较小,我们的结果需要在更大规模的研究中得到证实。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验