• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

清洁性颈部清扫术中的抗生素预防

Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean neck dissections.

作者信息

Seven Huseyin, Sayin Ibrahim, Turgut Suat

机构信息

Ear, Nose, and Throat Department, Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Laryngol Otol. 2004 Mar;118(3):213-6. doi: 10.1258/002221504322927991.

DOI:10.1258/002221504322927991
PMID:15068519
Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the effects of a prophylactic antibiotic regimen on the incidence of wound infection after clean neck dissections. A prospective series of 57 patients undergoing clean neck dissections with the use of perioperative ampicillin-sulbactam for 24 hours was compared with an historical control group of 51 patients undergoing clean neck dissections with no perioperative antibiotic use. The outcome variable was the incidence of post-operative wound infection. The two groups were similar for factors reported to influence the rate of post-operative wound infection. Wound infection occurred in one patient (1.7 per cent) in the study group and in seven patients (13.3 per cent) in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02). These data suggest that the use of a perioperative antibiotic for 24 hours in patients undergoing clean neck dissection results in significant reduction in the incidence of post-operative wound infection.

摘要

本研究旨在评估预防性抗生素方案对颈部清洁性清扫术后伤口感染发生率的影响。将前瞻性纳入的57例行颈部清洁性清扫术且围手术期使用氨苄西林舒巴坦24小时的患者系列与历史对照组51例行颈部清洁性清扫术且围手术期未使用抗生素的患者进行比较。结果变量为术后伤口感染发生率。两组在据报道会影响术后伤口感染率的因素方面相似。研究组有1例患者发生伤口感染(1.7%),对照组有7例患者发生伤口感染(13.3%),差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.02)。这些数据表明,颈部清洁性清扫术患者围手术期使用抗生素24小时可显著降低术后伤口感染的发生率。

相似文献

1
Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean neck dissections.清洁性颈部清扫术中的抗生素预防
J Laryngol Otol. 2004 Mar;118(3):213-6. doi: 10.1258/002221504322927991.
2
Antibiotics in head and neck surgery in the setting of malnutrition, tracheotomy, and diabetes.营养不良、气管切开术及糖尿病情况下头颈部手术中的抗生素应用
Laryngoscope. 2009 Mar;119(3):549-53. doi: 10.1002/lary.20078.
3
Prophylactic antibiotic use in clean, uncontaminated neck dissection.在清洁、未受污染的颈部清扫术中预防性使用抗生素。
Laryngoscope. 1995 Mar;105(3 Pt 1):244-6. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199503000-00004.
4
Antibiotic prophylaxis for post-operative wound infection in clean elective breast surgery.清洁择期乳房手术中术后伤口感染的抗生素预防
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000 Jun;26(4):363-6. doi: 10.1053/ejso.1999.0899.
5
Preliminary report of associated factors in wound infection after major head and neck neoplasm operations--does the duration of prophylactic antibiotic matter?头颈部重大肿瘤手术后伤口感染相关因素的初步报告——预防性抗生素的使用时长重要吗?
J Laryngol Otol. 2008 Apr;122(4):403-8. doi: 10.1017/S0022215107007529. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
6
A standardized regimen of antibiotics prevents infectious complications in skull base surgery.标准化的抗生素治疗方案可预防颅底手术中的感染并发症。
Laryngoscope. 2005 Aug;115(8):1347-57. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000172201.61487.69.
7
Wound infection in head and neck surgery: implications for perioperative antibiotic treatment.
Ear Nose Throat J. 1997 Nov;76(11):790-1, 795-8.
8
The role of topical antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing contaminated head and neck surgery with flap reconstruction.局部抗生素预防在接受污染性头颈部手术并进行皮瓣重建患者中的作用。
Laryngoscope. 2001 Feb;111(2):329-35. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200102000-00026.
9
Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean-contaminated head and neck oncological surgery.清洁-污染的头颈肿瘤手术中的抗生素预防
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007 Jan;35(1):15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2006.10.006. Epub 2007 Feb 12.
10
Three-dose vs extended-course clindamycin prophylaxis for free-flap reconstruction of the head and neck.三剂与延长疗程克林霉素预防对头颈部游离皮瓣重建的效果比较
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jul;129(7):771-4. doi: 10.1001/archotol.129.7.771.

引用本文的文献

1
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Neonates and Children Undergoing Dental, Maxillo-Facial or Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) Surgery: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study.接受牙科、颌面或耳鼻喉(ENT)手术的新生儿和儿童的抗菌药物预防:一项兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校适宜性方法共识研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Mar 13;11(3):382. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11030382.
2
Fascio-cutaneous-free flaps as primary reconstruction in salvage total laryngectomy.筋膜皮瓣游离皮瓣作为挽救性全喉切除术的主要重建方法。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jan;278(1):219-226. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06137-x. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
3
Evidence and evidence gaps of laryngeal cancer surgery.
喉癌手术的证据与证据空白
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec 15;15:Doc03. doi: 10.3205/cto000130. eCollection 2016.
4
Using information technology to reduce the inappropriate use of surgical prophylactic antibiotic.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Sep;265(9):1109-12. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0588-x. Epub 2008 Feb 2.