Suppr超能文献

在一项远程皮肤病学随机对照试验中,全科医生对异步远程医疗的看法。

General practitioners' perceptions of asynchronous telemedicine in a randomized controlled trial of teledermatology.

作者信息

Collins Karen, Bowns Ian, Walters Stephen

机构信息

Academic Palliative Medicine Unit, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10(2):94-8. doi: 10.1258/135763304773391530.

Abstract

We studied the perceptions of general practitioners (GPs) towards teledermatology, before and after its introduction into eight general practices for the purposes of a randomized controlled trial. A postal questionnaire was distributed before the trial and again one year later. Thirty-six of the 42 GPs responded on each occasion (a response rate of 86%). In the second survey, only 21% of respondents indicated that they were satisfied with teledermatology in their practice, while 47% said that they were dissatisfied. Thirty-one per cent said that they felt confident about diagnosis and management of care through teledermatology, and 28% reported that they were unconfident. Only 23% of respondents said that they would consider using a telemedicine system in the future, while 34% said they would not (43% were unsure). There were no significant findings to suggest that the GPs' perceptions changed over time. Less favourable responses to telemedicine were found than has been observed in previous studies, which suggests that the model of telemedicine described in this study would not be widely acceptable to GPs.

摘要

为了进行一项随机对照试验,我们在将远程皮肤病学引入八个全科医疗诊所之前和之后,研究了全科医生(GPs)对它的看法。在试验前和一年后分别发放了邮寄问卷。42名全科医生每次都有36人回复(回复率为86%)。在第二次调查中,只有21%的受访者表示他们对诊所中的远程皮肤病学感到满意,而47%的人表示不满意。31%的人说他们对通过远程皮肤病学进行诊断和护理管理有信心,28%的人报告说他们没有信心。只有23%的受访者表示他们未来会考虑使用远程医疗系统,而34%的人表示不会(43%不确定)。没有显著的结果表明全科医生的看法随时间发生了变化。与之前的研究相比,对远程医疗的负面反应更多,这表明本研究中描述的远程医疗模式不会被全科医生广泛接受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验