• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Analysis of interest group influence on federal school meals regulations 1992 to 1996.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004 Mar-Apr;36(2):90-8. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60139-5.
2
You are what you serve: are school districts liable for serving unhealthy food and beverages to students?吃什么就是什么:学区为学生提供不健康食品和饮料是否应承担责任?
Seton Hall Law Rev. 2004;34(3):1053-91.
3
National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program: nutrition standards for all foods sold in school as required by the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. Interim final rule.国家学校午餐计划和学校早餐计划:2010年《健康、无饥饿儿童法案》要求的学校销售的所有食品的营养标准。暂行最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2013 Jun 28;78(125):39067-120.
4
Nutrition rules: making healthy food choices available to school kids is a priority for many lawmakers.营养规则:为学童提供健康的食物选择是许多立法者的首要任务。
State Legis. 2008 May;34(5):22-4.
5
Nutrition standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs. Final rule.《全国学校午餐和学校早餐计划中的营养标准》。最终规定。
Fed Regist. 2012 Jan 26;77(17):4088-167.
6
The competitive food conundrum: can government regulations improve school food?竞争性食品难题:政府监管能否改善学校食品?
Duke Law J. 2007 Apr;56(6):1491-539.
7
From polling schools to planning policy: the role of the kids' safe and healthful foods project in school nutrition.从对学校进行民意调查到制定政策:儿童安全健康食品项目在学校营养中的作用。
Child Obes. 2013 Oct;9(5):372-5. doi: 10.1089/chi.2013.9503. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
8
Food fight: the battle over redefining competitive foods.食物之争:关于重新定义竞争性食品的较量。
J Sch Health. 2007 Mar;77(3):147-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00184.x.
9
ADA responds to USDA's proposed rules for school meals.美国糖尿病协会回应美国农业部关于学校膳食的拟议规则。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1994 Nov;94(11):1257. doi: 10.1016/0002-8223(94)92455-4.
10
The extent to which school district competitive food and beverage policies align with the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans: implications for federal regulations.学区竞争性食品和饮料政策与 2010 年美国人膳食指南的一致性程度:对联邦法规的影响。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Jun;112(6):892-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.01.025. Epub 2012 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying barriers and facilitators in the development and implementation of government-led food environment policies: a systematic review.识别政府主导的食品环境政策制定和实施中的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Nutr Rev. 2022 Jul 7;80(8):1896-1918. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuac016.
2
What drives political commitment for nutrition? A review and framework synthesis to inform the United Nations Decade of Action on Nutrition.推动政治层面重视营养的因素是什么?一项综述及框架综合分析,为联合国营养问题行动十年提供参考。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Feb 10;3(1):e000485. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000485. eCollection 2018.
3
Playing the policy game: a review of the barriers to and enablers of nutrition policy change.
玩转政策游戏:营养政策变革的障碍与推动因素综述
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Oct;19(14):2643-53. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016000677. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
4
Using political science to progress public health nutrition: a systematic review.运用政治学推动公共卫生营养:一项系统综述
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Aug;19(11):2070-8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015002712. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
5
Moving Canadian governmental policies beyond a focus on individual lifestyle: some insights from complexity and critical theories.超越个体生活方式焦点的加拿大政府政策:复杂性和批判理论的一些见解。
Health Promot Int. 2011 Mar;26(1):91-9. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daq052. Epub 2010 Aug 13.

Analysis of interest group influence on federal school meals regulations 1992 to 1996.

作者信息

Hobbs Suzanne Havala, Ricketts Thomas C, Dodds Janice M, Milio Nancy

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7411, USA.

出版信息

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004 Mar-Apr;36(2):90-8. doi: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60139-5.

DOI:10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60139-5
PMID:15068758
Abstract

Regulatory changes proposed by the US Department of Agriculture in 1994 promised to bring progressive changes to school meals. However, lobbying by interest groups resulted in substantial changes to the final rule. This analysis retrospectively examines the federal school meals policy-making process during 1992 to 1996. Key questions address why the policy changed and what the role of interest groups was in affecting the shape, pace, and direction of the policy. The study provides suggestions for using the experiences of 1992 to 1996 to guide future advocacy efforts and for adapting the approach for application to other food and nutrition policies.

摘要