Saketkhoo Daniel D, Bhargavan Mythreyi, Sunshine Jonathan H, Forman Howard P
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 330 Cedar St, TE-2, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Radiology. 2004 Apr;231(1):190-7. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2311030307. Epub 2004 Feb 27.
To investigate the methods used at private community hospitals for delivering emergency department (ED) image interpretation services.
The authors contacted a random national sample of 114 hospitals by telephone and administered an "ED Radiology Coverage" questionnaire. The questionnaire included queries about daytime image interpretation duties, nighttime radiology coverage arrangements, and radiologist staffing needs. Results were stratified on the basis of ED patient volumes and trauma center designation and were analyzed statistically by using multivariate and logistic regression analyses.
Representatives of 97 EDs responded to the questionnaire. Community hospital radiologists performed daytime primary interpretation of radiographs at 39 (40%) of 97 EDs, computed tomographic (CT) scans at 91 (95%) of 96 EDs, and ultrasonographic images at 87.5 (93%) of 94 EDs. "ED-dedicated" radiologists performed this emergency radiology work in only two (2%) of 97 EDs. During the nighttime, eight (8%) of 97 EDs had no radiology coverage, 80 (82%) of 97 EDs used teleradiology services in some form, and nine (9%) of 97 EDs employed in-house, rotating "non-ED-dedicated" radiologists. Analysis of participant responses revealed that clinicians at 37 (38%) of 97 EDs were able to consult radiologists for nighttime radiography questions, and 87 (92%) of 95 EDs had nighttime CT scans read by radiologists in time for patient care decisions. Twenty-four (25%) of 97 EDs reported radiologist staffing shortages, but only one indicated that it was actively trying to recruit ED-dedicated radiologists. Results of logistic regression analysis indicated that higher ED patient volumes (P =.005) and the presence of a trauma center (P =.02) each significantly increases the probability of higher nighttime levels of radiologist coverage.
There is great variation in the current provision of emergency radiology services in private community hospitals.
调查私立社区医院提供急诊科(ED)影像解读服务所采用的方法。
作者通过电话联系了全国范围内随机抽取的114家医院样本,并发放了一份“ED放射科覆盖情况”调查问卷。该问卷包括有关日间影像解读职责、夜间放射科覆盖安排以及放射科人员配备需求的问题。结果根据ED患者数量和创伤中心指定情况进行分层,并使用多变量和逻辑回归分析进行统计分析。
97家ED的代表回复了问卷。社区医院放射科医生在97家ED中的39家(40%)进行了日间X线片的初步解读,在96家ED中的91家(95%)进行了计算机断层扫描(CT),在94家ED中的87.5家(93%)进行了超声图像解读。“专门负责ED”的放射科医生仅在97家ED中的两家(2%)进行此项急诊放射工作。夜间,97家ED中有8家(8%)没有放射科覆盖,97家ED中有80家(82%)以某种形式使用了远程放射学服务,97家ED中有9家(9%)聘用内部轮流值班的“非专门负责ED”的放射科医生。对参与者回复的分析显示,97家ED中有37家(38%)的临床医生能够就夜间X线摄影问题咨询放射科医生,95家ED中有87家(92%)的夜间CT扫描结果能及时由放射科医生解读以供患者护理决策参考。97家ED中有24家(25%)报告放射科人员短缺,但只有一家表示正在积极招聘专门负责ED的放射科医生。逻辑回归分析结果表明,较高的ED患者数量(P = 0.005)和存在创伤中心(P = 0.02)均显著增加了夜间放射科医生较高覆盖水平的概率。
私立社区医院目前提供的急诊放射学服务存在很大差异。