Kumar Sanjay, Sperling John W, Haidukewych George H, Cofield Robert H
Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Apr;86(4):680-9. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200404000-00003.
Currently, there is little information concerning periprosthetic humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. Therefore, we reviewed our experience with these fractures to determine the results of treatment, the risk factors for periprosthetic fracture, and the rates of reoperation.
Between 1976 and 2001, nineteen postoperative periprosthetic humeral fractures occurred among 3091 patients who had undergone shoulder arthroplasty at our institution. Sixteen patients had a complete series of radiographs and were included in this study. The average time from the arthroplasty to the fracture was forty-nine months. Seven patients had severe osteopenia. Twelve fractures occurred at the tip of the prosthesis; of these, six extended proximally (type-A fractures) and six did not (type-B fractures). Three fractures occurred distal to the implant and extended into the distal humeral metaphysis (type-C fractures). One fracture occurred in the proximal metadiaphyseal region because of osteolysis.
Six fractures healed after an average of 180 days of nonoperative treatment. Five fractures were treated operatively after an average of 123 days of unsuccessful nonoperative treatment. The remaining five fractures had immediate operative treatment. All sixteen fractures healed. One patient required multiple operations over a period of three years before union was achieved. With the exclusion of this patient and one other patient who received a custom prosthesis, the average time between the first operative procedure and union was 278 days.
Our data do not clearly indicate the need for operative treatment of type-A fractures unless the humeral component is loose. A trial of nonoperative treatment may be considered for well-aligned type-B fractures that are associated with a well-fixed humeral component; however, operative intervention should be considered for type-B fractures that have not progressed toward union by three months. If the component is well fixed, open reduction and internal fixation may be performed. If the component is loose, revision with a long-stem component is recommended. For type-C fractures, a trial of nonoperative treatment is recommended.
目前,关于肩关节置换术后假体周围肱骨骨折的信息较少。因此,我们回顾了我们在这些骨折方面的经验,以确定治疗结果、假体周围骨折的危险因素以及再次手术率。
1976年至2001年期间,在我们机构接受肩关节置换术的3091例患者中发生了19例术后假体周围肱骨骨折。16例患者有完整系列的X线片,并被纳入本研究。从关节置换术到骨折的平均时间为49个月。7例患者有严重骨质减少。12例骨折发生在假体尖端;其中,6例向近端延伸(A型骨折),6例未向近端延伸(B型骨折)。3例骨折发生在植入物远端并延伸至肱骨干骺端(C型骨折)。1例骨折由于骨溶解发生在近端干骺端区域。
6例骨折经平均180天的非手术治疗后愈合。5例骨折在平均123天的非手术治疗失败后接受了手术治疗。其余5例骨折立即接受了手术治疗。所有16例骨折均愈合。1例患者在骨折愈合前的三年期间需要多次手术。排除该患者和另1例接受定制假体的患者后,首次手术与骨折愈合之间的平均时间为278天。
我们的数据并未明确表明除非肱骨假体松动,否则A型骨折需要手术治疗。对于与固定良好的肱骨假体相关的对线良好的B型骨折,可考虑进行非手术治疗试验;然而,对于三个月内未向愈合进展的B型骨折,应考虑手术干预。如果假体固定良好,可进行切开复位内固定。如果假体松动,建议使用长柄假体进行翻修。对于C型骨折,建议进行非手术治疗试验。