Apanaskevich D A
Parazitologiia. 2004 Jan-Feb;38(1):20-32.
Morphological characteristics allowing discriminating adult stages of four subspecies of Hyalomma marginatum (H. m. marginatum, H. m. turanicum, H. m. rufipes and H. m. isaaci) are displayed. The subspecies status of all named forms is confirmed. The main discriminating characters for adults of these subspecies are peculiarities of scutal or conscutal punctations and a shape of the dorsal tale of spiracular plates (Fig. 1, 1-4; 2, 4-7; 4, 1, 2; 5, 1, 2, 6, 5-8). Nevertheless, there are a number of facts, which support only the subspecific rank of these taxa. In Turkmenistan, there is a zone inhabited by forms, adult stages of which are morphologically intermedial between H. m. marginatum and H. m. turanicum. A zone of intermedial forms between H. m. turanicum and H. m. rufipes exists in Arabian Peninsula (Hoogstraal e. a., 1981). An absence of clear discriminative characters between immatures of H. m. marginatum, H. m. turanicum and H. m. rufipes also confirms the subspecies level of these taxa. H. m. isaaci is the most differentiated subspecies. It is difficult to estimate relationships between the latter subspecies and H. m. turanicum because of a deficit of materials. However, clear morphological differences of H. m. isaaci immature stages from other subspecies were noticed (Apanaskevich, 2003). Therefore, it is quite probable that H. m. isaaci might deserve the species rank. Further analysis of relationships between subspecies of H. marginatum needs additional materials represented by all stages from zones containing intermedial forms between recently recognized subspecies.
展示了允许区分边缘璃眼蜱四个亚种(边缘璃眼蜱指名亚种、图兰璃眼蜱、红足璃眼蜱和伊氏璃眼蜱)成虫阶段的形态特征。所有已命名形态的亚种地位得到确认。这些亚种成虫的主要鉴别特征是盾板或副盾板刻点的特点以及气门板背叶的形状(图1,1 - 4;图2,4 - 7;图4,1,2;图5,1,2,6,5 - 8)。然而,有一些事实仅支持这些分类单元的亚种等级。在土库曼斯坦,存在一个由一些形态介于边缘璃眼蜱指名亚种和图兰璃眼蜱之间的形态所占据的区域。在阿拉伯半岛存在图兰璃眼蜱和红足璃眼蜱之间的中间形态区域(胡格斯特拉尔等人,1981年)。边缘璃眼蜱指名亚种、图兰璃眼蜱和红足璃眼蜱未成熟阶段缺乏明确的鉴别特征也证实了这些分类单元的亚种水平。伊氏璃眼蜱是分化程度最高的亚种。由于材料不足,难以估计后一个亚种与图兰璃眼蜱之间的关系。然而,已注意到伊氏璃眼蜱未成熟阶段与其他亚种存在明显的形态差异(阿帕纳斯凯维奇,2003年)。因此,伊氏璃眼蜱很可能应被视为一个物种。对边缘璃眼蜱亚种之间关系的进一步分析需要来自包含最近确认亚种之间中间形态区域的所有阶段的额外材料。