Suppr超能文献

在忽视症患者中,直接指向与长线二等分相关。

Straight-ahead pointing correlates with long-line bisection in neglect patients.

作者信息

Richard Christelle, Honoré Jacques, Bernati Thérèse, Rousseaux Marc

机构信息

Service de Rééducation Neurologique, Hôpital Swynghedauw, CHRU, Lille, France.

出版信息

Cortex. 2004 Feb;40(1):75-83. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70921-3.

Abstract

The spatial bias of neglect patients has been assumed to result from the alteration of a body-centred representation which underlies actions within personal and extra-personal spaces. This deficit seems to correspond to the ipsilesional deviation of the subjective straight-ahead (SSA), often described in neglect patients. However, several recent studies have failed to show significant correlations between the SSA deviation and performance in standard visuo-spatial tests of neglect. Since methodological choices could explain these negative results, the present study re-investigated the question. SSA, assessed by manual pointing, was anchored by instructions to a precise median body part. A body-centred line bisection task was also carried out, during the same session and in similar experimental conditions. Sixteen right brain-damaged patients with (n = 8) or without (n = 8) neglect, and 8 control subjects free of any neurological problem were included. Taken as a group, the neglect group stood out from the others in both tasks. Moreover, in neglect patients only, SSA position significantly correlated with bisection error for long lines, even if dissociations between SSA shift and bisection error were found in two cases. Results are discussed with regard to the nature of the tasks proposed in the different studies and to methodological aspects that could at least partly explain the aforementioned failures.

摘要

偏侧忽视患者的空间偏差被认为是由于以身体为中心的表征发生改变所致,这种表征是个人空间和个人周边空间内行动的基础。这种缺陷似乎与偏侧忽视患者中经常描述的主观直视方向(SSA)的同侧偏差相对应。然而,最近的几项研究未能显示SSA偏差与偏侧忽视的标准视觉空间测试表现之间存在显著相关性。由于方法学选择可以解释这些负面结果,本研究重新探讨了这个问题。通过手动指向评估的SSA,通过指令锚定到精确的身体中间部位。在同一时间段和相似的实验条件下,还进行了一项以身体为中心的线段二等分任务。纳入了16名右脑损伤患者,其中8名有偏侧忽视(n = 8),8名无偏侧忽视(n = 8),以及8名没有任何神经问题的对照受试者。作为一个整体,偏侧忽视组在两项任务中都与其他组有所不同。此外,仅在偏侧忽视患者中,即使在两例中发现了SSA偏移和二等分误差之间的分离,SSA位置与长线的二等分误差也显著相关。针对不同研究中提出的任务性质以及至少可以部分解释上述失败的方法学方面对结果进行了讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验