• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用电子全口曲面断层摄影机时髁间距离与界面宽度的比较。

Comparison of the intercondylar distance and the interfacial width as used with the electronic pantograph.

作者信息

Mandilaris C B, Beard C C, Clayton J A

机构信息

University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Mar;67(3):331-4. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90241-2.

DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(92)90241-2
PMID:1507096
Abstract

The electronic pantograph (Pantronic) records mandibular movements and computes the articulator settings. The Pantronic pantograph does not determine the intercondylar distance but approximates it from the interfacial width at the condyles. An average distance of 12.5 mm is subtracted from each side to determine the intercondylar distance. This study recorded 45 patients' articulator intercondylar distances that had been set from a mechanical pantograph and they were compared with the Pantronic's approximation. The difference between the interfacial width and the actual intercondylar distance was 15.1 mm on the right side and 14.9 mm on the left side. A numerical value of 15.0 mm was statistically superior to the Pantronic's 12.5 mm in estimating the average distance between the intercondylar distance and the surface of the skin at the condyle. No statistically significant difference was found between the differences of interfacial width and intercondylar distance values for men and women (p greater than 0.05). The mean intercondylar distance was 56.5 mm on the right side and 56.7 mm on the left side. A statistically significant difference was found between the mean intercondylar distances of men and women (p less than 0.05).

摘要

电子面弓(Pantronic)记录下颌运动并计算咬合架设置。Pantronic面弓并不确定髁间距离,而是根据髁突处的界面宽度来估算。从每一侧减去12.5mm的平均距离以确定髁间距离。本研究记录了45例通过机械面弓设置的咬合架髁间距离,并将其与Pantronic面弓的估算值进行比较。右侧界面宽度与实际髁间距离的差值为15.1mm,左侧为14.9mm。在估算髁间距离与髁突处皮肤表面之间的平均距离时,15.0mm的数值在统计学上优于Pantronic面弓的12.5mm。男性和女性在界面宽度与髁间距离值的差异上未发现统计学显著差异(p大于0.05)。右侧髁间平均距离为56.5mm,左侧为56.7mm。男性和女性的髁间平均距离之间存在统计学显著差异(p小于0.05)。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the intercondylar distance and the interfacial width as used with the electronic pantograph.使用电子全口曲面断层摄影机时髁间距离与界面宽度的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Mar;67(3):331-4. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90241-2.
2
A comparison of articulator settings obtained by using an electronic pantograph and lateral interocclusal recordings.使用电子面弓和侧向牙合记录获得的牙合架设置的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 1988 Aug;60(2):159-64. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90307-1.
3
A graphic comparison of mandibular border movements generated by various articulators. Part I: Methodology.不同牙合架产生的下颌边缘运动的图形比较。第一部分:方法学。
J Prosthet Dent. 1988 Aug;60(2):194-8. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90315-0.
4
A graphic comparison of mandibular border movements generated by various articulators. Part II: Results.不同咬合架产生的下颌边缘运动的图形比较。第二部分:结果。
J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Apr;61(4):425-9. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90007-3.
5
Comparison of an electronic and a mechanical pantograph. Part I: Consistency of an electronic computerized pantograph to record articulator settings.电子比例缩放仪与机械比例缩放仪的比较。第一部分:电子计算机化比例缩放仪记录咬合架设置的一致性。
J Prosthet Dent. 1986 May;55(5):570-4. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(86)90033-8.
6
Effects of changes in articulator settings on generated occlusal tracings. Part II: Immediate side shift, intercondylar distance, and rear and top wall settings.
J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Mar;65(3):377-82. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90228-o.
7
Use of the Stuart articulator in obtaining optimal occlusion.使用斯图尔特牙合架获得最佳咬合。
Dent Clin North Am. 1979 Apr;23(2):259-70.
8
Observations on the use of the Denar pantograph and articulator.
J Prosthet Dent. 1977 Dec;38(6):660-72. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(77)90012-9.
9
An in vitro evaluation of the reliability and validity of an electronic pantograph by testing with five different articulators.通过使用五种不同的牙合架进行测试,对电子面弓的可靠性和有效性进行体外评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Jul;92(1):83-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.04.011.
10
Errors incurred in programming a fully adjustable articulator with a pantograph.使用面弓在全可调牙合架上编程时出现的误差。
J Prosthet Dent. 1986 Apr;55(4):427-9. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(86)90168-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Mandibular ramus height and condyle distance asymmetries in individuals with different facial growth patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.不同面部生长型个体的下颌支高度和髁突间距不对称:锥形束 CT 研究。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2021 Feb;43(2):267-274. doi: 10.1007/s00276-020-02577-6. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
2
Relationship of inter-condylar distance with inter-dental distance of maxillary arch and occlusal vertical dimension: a clinical anthropometric study.髁间距离与上颌牙弓牙间距离及咬合垂直距离的关系:一项临床人体测量学研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Dec;8(12):ZC39-43. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/10194.5289. Epub 2014 Dec 5.