美国食品药品监督管理局、政治与“紧急避孕药”（Plan B） - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

The FDA, politics, and plan B.

作者信息

Drazen Jeffrey M, Greene Michael F, Wood Alastair J J

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 8;350(15):1561-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe048057.

DOI:10.1056/NEJMe048057

PMID:15071131

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

The FDA, politics, and plan B.

N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 8;350(15):1561-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe048057.

The FDA, politics, and plan B.

N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 3;350(23):2413-4; author reply 2413-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200406033502316.

The FDA, politics, and plan B.

N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 3;350(23):2413-4; author reply 2413-4.

A sad day for science at the FDA.

N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 15;353(24):2619-21; author reply 2619-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc052810.

A sad day for science at the FDA.

N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 22;353(12):1197-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058222. Epub 2005 Sep 1.

Waiting for plan B--the FDA and nonprescription use of emergency contraception.

N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 3;350(23):2327-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048135.

Drug regulation. Plan B: A collision of science and politics.

Science. 2005 Oct 7;310(5745):38-9. doi: 10.1126/science.310.5745.38.

A sad day for science at the FDA.

N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 15;353(24):2619-21; author reply 2619-21.

Plan B: Politics and values at the FDA, again.

Hastings Cent Rep. 2004 Nov-Dec;34(6):9-10.

Emergency contraception: politics trumps science at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;104(2):220-1. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000135804.89369.59.

引用本文的文献

Prescription Requirements and Patient Autonomy: Considering an Over-the-Counter Default.

Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 Nov;50(6):15-26. doi: 10.1002/hast.1195.

Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Abortion, and Publication Bias in the .

Linacre Q. 2019 Feb;86(1):103-114. doi: 10.1177/0024363919838855. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

Obstetrician-gynecologist physicians' beliefs about emergency contraception: a national survey.

Contraception. 2010 Oct;82(4):324-30. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.04.151. Epub 2010 Jul 15.

Politics and the erosion of federal scientific capacity: restoring scientific integrity to public health science.

Am J Public Health. 2007 Nov;97(11):1939-44. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.118455. Epub 2007 Sep 27.

External influences and priority-setting for anti-cancer agents: a case study of media coverage in adjuvant trastuzumab for breast cancer.

BMC Cancer. 2007 Jun 28;7:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-110.

What is the future of peer review? Why is there fraud in science? Is plagiarism out of control? Why do scientists do bad things? Is it all a case of: "all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"?

Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3(1):39-53.

Impact on contraceptive practice of making emergency hormonal contraception available over the counter in Great Britain: repeated cross sectional surveys.

BMJ. 2005 Jul 30;331(7511):271. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38519.440266.8F. Epub 2005 Jul 11.

Which drugs should be available over the counter?

BMJ. 2004 Jul 24;329(7459):182-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7459.182.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

The FDA, politics, and plan B.

N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 8;350(15):1561-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe048057.

The FDA, politics, and plan B.

N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 3;350(23):2413-4; author reply 2413-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200406033502316.

The FDA, politics, and plan B.

N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 3;350(23):2413-4; author reply 2413-4.

A sad day for science at the FDA.

N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 15;353(24):2619-21; author reply 2619-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc052810.

A sad day for science at the FDA.

N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 22;353(12):1197-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058222. Epub 2005 Sep 1.

Waiting for plan B--the FDA and nonprescription use of emergency contraception.

N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 3;350(23):2327-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048135.

Drug regulation. Plan B: A collision of science and politics.

Science. 2005 Oct 7;310(5745):38-9. doi: 10.1126/science.310.5745.38.

A sad day for science at the FDA.

N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 15;353(24):2619-21; author reply 2619-21.

Plan B: Politics and values at the FDA, again.

Hastings Cent Rep. 2004 Nov-Dec;34(6):9-10.

Emergency contraception: politics trumps science at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;104(2):220-1. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000135804.89369.59.

引用本文的文献

Prescription Requirements and Patient Autonomy: Considering an Over-the-Counter Default.

Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 Nov;50(6):15-26. doi: 10.1002/hast.1195.

Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Abortion, and Publication Bias in the .

Linacre Q. 2019 Feb;86(1):103-114. doi: 10.1177/0024363919838855. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

Obstetrician-gynecologist physicians' beliefs about emergency contraception: a national survey.

Contraception. 2010 Oct;82(4):324-30. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.04.151. Epub 2010 Jul 15.

Politics and the erosion of federal scientific capacity: restoring scientific integrity to public health science.

Am J Public Health. 2007 Nov;97(11):1939-44. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.118455. Epub 2007 Sep 27.

External influences and priority-setting for anti-cancer agents: a case study of media coverage in adjuvant trastuzumab for breast cancer.

BMC Cancer. 2007 Jun 28;7:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-110.

Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3(1):39-53.

Impact on contraceptive practice of making emergency hormonal contraception available over the counter in Great Britain: repeated cross sectional surveys.

BMJ. 2005 Jul 30;331(7511):271. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38519.440266.8F. Epub 2005 Jul 11.

Which drugs should be available over the counter?

BMJ. 2004 Jul 24;329(7459):182-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7459.182.