Marston Cicely, Meltzer Howard, Majeed Azeem
Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, London W6 8RP.
BMJ. 2005 Jul 30;331(7511):271. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38519.440266.8F. Epub 2005 Jul 11.
To examine the impact on contraceptive practice of making emergency hormonal contraception available over the counter.
Analysis of data on contraceptive practice for women aged 16-49 years in the period 2000-2 from the Omnibus Survey, a multipurpose survey in which around 7600 adults living in private households are interviewed each year.
Private households in Great Britain.
Use of different types of contraception and rates of unprotected sex.
After emergency hormonal contraception was made available over the counter, levels of use of different types of contraception by women aged 16-49 remained similar. No significant change occurred in the proportion of women using emergency hormonal contraception (8.4% in 2000, 7.9% in 2001, 7.2% in 2002) or having unprotected sex. A change did, however, occur in where women obtained emergency hormonal contraception; a smaller proportion of women obtained emergency hormonal contraception from physicians and a greater proportion bought it over the counter. No significant change occurred in the proportion of women using more reliable methods of contraception, such as the oral contraceptive pill, or in the proportion of women using emergency hormonal contraception more than once during a year.
Making emergency hormonal contraception available over the counter does not seem to have led to an increase in its use, to an increase in unprotected sex, or to a decrease in the use of more reliable methods of contraception.
研究非处方提供紧急激素避孕措施对避孕行为的影响。
对2000 - 2002年综合调查中16 - 49岁女性避孕行为数据的分析。该综合调查为多用途调查,每年约对7600名居住在私人家庭的成年人进行访谈。
英国私人家庭。
不同类型避孕方法的使用情况及无保护性行为发生率。
非处方提供紧急激素避孕措施后,16 - 49岁女性使用不同类型避孕方法的水平保持相似。使用紧急激素避孕措施的女性比例(2000年为8.4%,2001年为7.9%,2002年为7.2%)或发生无保护性行为的女性比例均无显著变化。然而,女性获取紧急激素避孕措施的途径发生了变化;从医生处获取紧急激素避孕措施的女性比例降低,而通过非处方购买的女性比例增加。使用更可靠避孕方法(如口服避孕药)的女性比例或一年内多次使用紧急激素避孕措施的女性比例均无显著变化。
非处方提供紧急激素避孕措施似乎并未导致其使用增加、无保护性行为增加或更可靠避孕方法的使用减少。