Suppr超能文献

在英国非处方提供紧急激素避孕措施对避孕行为的影响:重复横断面调查

Impact on contraceptive practice of making emergency hormonal contraception available over the counter in Great Britain: repeated cross sectional surveys.

作者信息

Marston Cicely, Meltzer Howard, Majeed Azeem

机构信息

Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, London W6 8RP.

出版信息

BMJ. 2005 Jul 30;331(7511):271. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38519.440266.8F. Epub 2005 Jul 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact on contraceptive practice of making emergency hormonal contraception available over the counter.

DESIGN

Analysis of data on contraceptive practice for women aged 16-49 years in the period 2000-2 from the Omnibus Survey, a multipurpose survey in which around 7600 adults living in private households are interviewed each year.

SETTING

Private households in Great Britain.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Use of different types of contraception and rates of unprotected sex.

RESULTS

After emergency hormonal contraception was made available over the counter, levels of use of different types of contraception by women aged 16-49 remained similar. No significant change occurred in the proportion of women using emergency hormonal contraception (8.4% in 2000, 7.9% in 2001, 7.2% in 2002) or having unprotected sex. A change did, however, occur in where women obtained emergency hormonal contraception; a smaller proportion of women obtained emergency hormonal contraception from physicians and a greater proportion bought it over the counter. No significant change occurred in the proportion of women using more reliable methods of contraception, such as the oral contraceptive pill, or in the proportion of women using emergency hormonal contraception more than once during a year.

CONCLUSIONS

Making emergency hormonal contraception available over the counter does not seem to have led to an increase in its use, to an increase in unprotected sex, or to a decrease in the use of more reliable methods of contraception.

摘要

目的

研究非处方提供紧急激素避孕措施对避孕行为的影响。

设计

对2000 - 2002年综合调查中16 - 49岁女性避孕行为数据的分析。该综合调查为多用途调查,每年约对7600名居住在私人家庭的成年人进行访谈。

地点

英国私人家庭。

主要观察指标

不同类型避孕方法的使用情况及无保护性行为发生率。

结果

非处方提供紧急激素避孕措施后,16 - 49岁女性使用不同类型避孕方法的水平保持相似。使用紧急激素避孕措施的女性比例(2000年为8.4%,2001年为7.9%,2002年为7.2%)或发生无保护性行为的女性比例均无显著变化。然而,女性获取紧急激素避孕措施的途径发生了变化;从医生处获取紧急激素避孕措施的女性比例降低,而通过非处方购买的女性比例增加。使用更可靠避孕方法(如口服避孕药)的女性比例或一年内多次使用紧急激素避孕措施的女性比例均无显著变化。

结论

非处方提供紧急激素避孕措施似乎并未导致其使用增加、无保护性行为增加或更可靠避孕方法的使用减少。

相似文献

6
The effects of self-administering emergency contraception.自行服用紧急避孕药的效果。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 2;339(1):1-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807023390101.
8
Emergency contraception.紧急避孕
Newsl Womens Glob Netw Reprod Rights. 1994 Jan-Mar(45):12-3.

引用本文的文献

5
Emergency contraception from the pharmacy 20 years on: a mystery shopper study.20 年后的药店紧急避孕:神秘顾客研究。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021 Jan;47(1):55-60. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200648. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
8
Role of the pharmacist in reducing healthcare costs: current insights.药剂师在降低医疗成本中的作用:当前见解
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2017 Jan 25;6:37-46. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S108047. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Which drugs should be available over the counter?哪些药物应该非处方可得?
BMJ. 2004 Jul 24;329(7459):182-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7459.182.
2
Plan B for "Plan B"? FDA denies OTC sales of emergency contraceptive.
JAMA. 2004 Jun 16;291(23):2805-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.23.2805.
3
Emergency contraception kept as prescription only in USA.
Lancet. 2004 May 22;363(9422):1707. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16290-9.
7
Clinical practice. Emergency contraception.
N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 6;349(19):1830-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp031990.
10
Switching emergency contraception to over-the-counter status.将紧急避孕药改为非处方状态。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 2;348(1):82-3; author reply 82-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200301023480119.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验