Lam H S, Lingeman J E, Mosbaugh P G, Steele R E, Knapp P M, Scott J W, Newman D M
Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis.
J Urol. 1992 Sep;148(3 Pt 2):1058-62. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36816-7.
Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy with or without extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has been extensively used in the management of staghorn calculi, with stone-free rates varying from 23 to 86%. Explanations for the variability of such results include differences in stone burden, differences in percutaneous techniques and an overreliance on ESWL. The results and changing trends in the relative roles of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and ESWL in the management of staghorn calculi at the Methodist Hospital of Indiana were examined. We reviewed 343 cases of staghorn calculi (partial and complete) with adequate followup data, which were managed with initial percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Cases were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (252 cases) from 1984 to 1987 when access was performed by a radiologist and group 2 (91 cases) from 1988 to 1990 when access was performed by a urologist. Although stones in group 2 tended to be larger, a decreasing dependence on ESWL was noted (64.7% in group 1 compared to 35.2% in group 2, p less than 0.001). Despite the larger stone size in group 2, stone-free rates were similar (83.3% in group 1, 86.8% in group 2). In groups 1 and 2 percutaneous nephrostolithotomy alone achieved stone-free rates of 91% and 91.5%, respectively. The stone-free rate with the combination approach was 79.1% and 78.1% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Technical refinements with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy in group 2 include accurate and carefully selected accesses (superior pole in 36.3%) for best approach to the stone, multiple accesses (13.3%) and improved skills in flexible nephroscopy. Blood transfusion has not been required in group 2 compared with 11.1% in group 1. Mean hospital stay was 12.4 days in group 1 and 10.3 days in group 2 (percutaneous nephrostolithotomy alone, 7.2 days). With careful attention to percutaneous nephrostolithotomy techniques, complex renal stones can be successfully managed endourologically, reducing the need for combination ESWL. Complications previously associated with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy have decreased.
经皮肾镜取石术联合或不联合体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)已广泛应用于鹿角形结石的治疗,结石清除率在23%至86%之间。这些结果差异的原因包括结石负荷不同、经皮技术差异以及对ESWL的过度依赖。我们研究了印第安纳卫理公会医院经皮肾镜取石术和ESWL在鹿角形结石治疗中相对作用的结果及变化趋势。我们回顾了343例有充分随访数据的鹿角形结石(部分和完全鹿角形结石)病例,这些病例最初均采用经皮肾镜取石术治疗。病例分为两组:第1组(252例)为1984年至1987年期间由放射科医生进行穿刺造瘘的病例,第2组(91例)为1988年至1990年期间由泌尿外科医生进行穿刺造瘘的病例。尽管第2组的结石往往更大,但对ESWL的依赖程度有所降低(第1组为64.7%,第2组为35.2%,p<0.001)。尽管第2组结石更大,但结石清除率相似(第1组为83.3%,第2组为86.8%)。在第1组和第2组中,单纯经皮肾镜取石术的结石清除率分别为91%和91.5%。联合治疗方法在第1组和第2组中的结石清除率分别为79.1%和78.1%。第2组经皮肾镜取石术的技术改进包括准确且精心选择穿刺通道(36.3%为上极)以最佳方式接近结石、采用多个穿刺通道(13.3%)以及提高软性肾镜操作技能。第2组无需输血,而第1组为11.1%。第1组的平均住院时间为12.4天,第2组为10.3天(单纯经皮肾镜取石术为7.2天)。通过仔细关注经皮肾镜取石术技术,复杂性肾结石可通过腔内泌尿外科手术成功治疗,减少了联合ESWL的需求。以前与经皮肾镜取石术相关的并发症有所减少。