Peces-Barba G, Rodríguez-Nieto M J, Verbanck S, Paiva M, González-Mangado N
Pulmonary Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Universidad Autónoma, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 May;96(5):1937-42. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00255.2003.
We evaluated the effect of prone positioning on gas-transfer characteristics in normal human subjects. Single-breath (SB) and rebreathing (RB) maneuvers were employed to assess carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DlCO), its components related to capillary blood volume (Vc) and membrane diffusing capacity (Dm), pulmonary tissue volume (Vti), and cardiac output (Qc). Alveolar volume (Va) was significantly greater prone than supine, irrespective of the test maneuver used. Nevertheless, Dl(CO) was consistently lower prone than supine, a difference that was enhanced when appropriately corrected for the higher Va prone. When adequately corrected for Va, diffusing capacity significantly decreased by 8% from supine to prone [SB: Dl(CO,corr) supine vs. prone: 32.6 +/- 2.3 (SE) vs. 30.0 +/- 2 ml x min(-1) x mmHg(-1) stpd; RB: Dl(CO,corr) supine vs. prone: 30.2 +/- 2.2 (SE) vs. 27.8 +/- 2.0 ml x min(-1) x mmHg(-1) stpd]. Both Vc and Dm showed a tendency to decrease from supine to prone, but neither reached significance. Finally, there were no significant differences in Vti or Qc between supine and prone. We interpret the lower diffusing capacity of the healthy lung in the prone posture based on the relatively larger space occupied by the heart in the dependent lung zones, leaving less space for zone 3 capillaries, and on the relatively lower position of the heart, leaving the zone 3 capillaries less engorged.
我们评估了俯卧位对正常人体气体交换特征的影响。采用单次呼吸(SB)和重复呼吸(RB)操作来评估一氧化碳弥散能力(DlCO)、其与毛细血管血容量(Vc)和膜弥散能力(Dm)相关的组分、肺组织容积(Vti)和心输出量(Qc)。无论采用何种测试操作,俯卧位时的肺泡容积(Va)均显著大于仰卧位。然而,俯卧位时的Dl(CO)始终低于仰卧位,在对俯卧位时较高的Va进行适当校正后,这种差异更加明显。在对Va进行充分校正后,从仰卧位到俯卧位,弥散能力显著降低了8%[SB:校正后的Dl(CO)仰卧位与俯卧位:32.6±2.3(SE)与30.0±2 ml·min⁻¹·mmHg⁻¹ stpd;RB:校正后的Dl(CO)仰卧位与俯卧位:30.2±2.2(SE)与27.8±2.0 ml·min⁻¹·mmHg⁻¹ stpd]。Vc和Dm均呈现出从仰卧位到俯卧位下降的趋势,但均未达到显著水平。最后,仰卧位和俯卧位之间的Vti或Qc没有显著差异。我们认为,健康肺在俯卧位时弥散能力较低是基于以下原因:在重力依赖肺区,心脏占据的空间相对较大,导致3区毛细血管的空间减少;以及心脏位置相对较低,使得3区毛细血管充血较少。