Gupta Narendar Mohan, Gupta Rajesh
Department of Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh, India.
Ann Surg. 2004 Mar;239(3):359-63. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000114218.48318.68.
To analyze the feasibility and safety of transhiatal approach for resection of corrosively scarred esophagus. BACKGROUND SUMMARY DATA: The unrelenting corrosive strictures of esophagus merit esophageal substitution. Because of the risk of complications in the retained esophagus, such as malignancy, mucocele, gastroesophageal reflux, and bleeding, esophageal resection is deemed necessary. Transthoracic approach for esophageal resection is considered safe. The safety and feasibility of transhiatal resection of the esophagus is not established in corrosive injury of the esophagus.
Transhiatal approach was used for resection of the scarred esophagus for all patients between January 1986 and December 2001. The intraoperative complications, indications for adding thoracotomy, and postoperative outcome were studied in 51 patients. Follow-up period varied from minimum of 6 months to 15 years.
Esophageal resection was achieved in 49 of 51 patients whereas thoracotomy was added in 2 patients. In 1 of the patients tracheal injury occurred whereas in other patient there were dense adhesions between tracheal membrane and esophagus. Gastric tube was used for esophageal substitution in 40 (78.4%) patients whereas colon was transplanted in 11 (21.6%) patients. Colon was used only when stomach was not available. One patient (1.9%) had tracheal membrane injury whereas 4 patients (7.8%) had recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. One patient each had thoracic duct injury and intrathoracic gastric tube leak. There was no operative mortality. Anastomotic complications like leak were present in 19.6% and stricture in 58.8% patients. All the patients were able to resume their normal duties and swallow normal food within 6 months of the surgery.
One-stage transhiatal esophageal resection and reconstruction could be safely used for the extirpation of scarred esophagus. Use of gastric conduit was technically simple, quicker, and offered good functional outcome. Postoperative anastomotic stricture amenable to dilatations was the commonest complication.
分析经裂孔途径切除腐蚀性瘢痕食管的可行性及安全性。背景总结资料:食管的顽固性腐蚀性狭窄需要进行食管替代。由于保留食管存在发生并发症的风险,如恶性肿瘤、黏液囊肿、胃食管反流和出血,因此认为有必要进行食管切除。经胸途径进行食管切除被认为是安全的。在食管腐蚀性损伤中,经裂孔切除食管的安全性和可行性尚未确立。
1986年1月至2001年12月期间,所有患者均采用经裂孔途径切除瘢痕食管。对51例患者的术中并发症、中转开胸的指征及术后结果进行了研究。随访时间最短为6个月,最长为15年。
51例患者中有49例成功完成食管切除,2例中转开胸。其中1例患者发生气管损伤,另1例患者气管膜与食管之间粘连致密。40例(78.4%)患者采用胃管进行食管替代,11例(21.6%)患者采用结肠移植。仅在无法使用胃时才使用结肠。1例患者(1.9%)发生气管膜损伤,4例患者(7.8%)发生喉返神经麻痹。各有1例患者发生胸导管损伤和胸内胃管漏。无手术死亡病例。吻合口漏等并发症发生率为19.6%,吻合口狭窄发生率为58.8%。所有患者术后6个月内均能恢复正常生活和正常饮食。
一期经裂孔食管切除重建术可安全用于切除瘢痕食管。使用胃代食管技术操作简单、速度快,功能效果良好。术后吻合口狭窄且可通过扩张治疗是最常见的并发症。