• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

免疫抑制剂的抗真菌特性:器官移植受者机会性真菌病管理的新范式及阐明其病理生理基础

Antifungal attributes of immunosuppressive agents: new paradigms in management and elucidating the pathophysiologic basis of opportunistic mycoses in organ transplant recipients.

作者信息

Singh Nina, Heitman Joseph

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. nis5+@pitt.edu

出版信息

Transplantation. 2004 Mar 27;77(6):795-800. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000117252.75651.d6.

DOI:10.1097/01.tp.0000117252.75651.d6
PMID:15077015
Abstract

The currently available immunosuppressive agents cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, and rapamycin have potent antifungal activity against a number of opportunistic fungi in organ transplant recipients, most notably, C. neoformans, Candida, and Aspergillus species. The targets of their antifungal activity are fungal homologs of the signaling molecules that mediate their immunosuppressive action in humans, which has implications for further unraveling the pathogenesis of these infections. Corroborative clinical data suggest that despite the apparent paradox between the antifungal activity of the immunosuppressive agents and the occurrence of fungal infections during their administration, the antifungal attributes of these drugs may influence the spectrum and clinical characteristics of these infections after organ transplantation. Finally, the potent synergistic interactions between the immunosuppressive agents and antifungal drugs against many pathogenic fungi, including those that are typically resistant to traditional antifungal agents, could potentially have a role in devising novel therapeutic strategies for opportunistic mycoses in transplant recipients.

摘要

目前可用的免疫抑制剂环孢素A、他克莫司和雷帕霉素对器官移植受者中的多种机会性真菌具有强大的抗真菌活性,最显著的是新生隐球菌、念珠菌和曲霉菌种。它们抗真菌活性的靶点是在人类中介导其免疫抑制作用的信号分子的真菌同源物,这对于进一步阐明这些感染的发病机制具有重要意义。确凿的临床数据表明,尽管免疫抑制剂的抗真菌活性与给药期间真菌感染的发生之间存在明显矛盾,但这些药物的抗真菌特性可能会影响器官移植后这些感染的范围和临床特征。最后,免疫抑制剂与抗真菌药物对许多致病真菌,包括那些通常对传统抗真菌药物耐药的真菌之间的强大协同相互作用,可能在为移植受者的机会性真菌病设计新的治疗策略方面发挥作用。

相似文献

1
Antifungal attributes of immunosuppressive agents: new paradigms in management and elucidating the pathophysiologic basis of opportunistic mycoses in organ transplant recipients.免疫抑制剂的抗真菌特性:器官移植受者机会性真菌病管理的新范式及阐明其病理生理基础
Transplantation. 2004 Mar 27;77(6):795-800. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000117252.75651.d6.
2
Trends in the epidemiology of opportunistic fungal infections: predisposing factors and the impact of antimicrobial use practices.机会性真菌感染的流行病学趋势:诱发因素及抗菌药物使用习惯的影响
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Nov 15;33(10):1692-6. doi: 10.1086/323895. Epub 2001 Oct 12.
3
Infectious complications in organ transplant recipients with the use of calcineurin-inhibitor agent-based immunosuppressive regimens.使用基于钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂的免疫抑制方案的器官移植受者的感染性并发症。
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2005 Aug;18(4):342-5. doi: 10.1097/01.qco.0000172698.52408.be.
4
Emerging fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients.实体器官移植受者新发真菌感染。
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2013 Jun;27(2):305-16. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
5
The impact of novel immunosuppressive agents on infections in organ transplant recipients and the interactions of these agents with antimicrobials.新型免疫抑制剂对器官移植受者感染的影响以及这些药物与抗菌药物的相互作用。
Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Jul 1;35(1):53-61. doi: 10.1086/340867. Epub 2002 Jun 5.
6
Opportunistic mycelial fungal infections in organ transplant recipients: emerging importance of non-Aspergillus mycelial fungi.器官移植受者中的机会性丝状真菌感染:非曲霉菌丝状真菌的重要性日益凸显
Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Jul 15;37(2):221-9. doi: 10.1086/375822. Epub 2003 Jul 9.
7
Clinical aspects of fungal infection in organ transplant recipients.器官移植受者真菌感染的临床方面
Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Aug;19 Suppl 1:S33-40. doi: 10.1093/clinids/19.supplement_1.s33.
8
Opportunistic deep cutaneous mycoses in solid organ transplant recipients.实体器官移植受者的机会性深部皮肤真菌病
G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2014 Aug;149(4):417-22.
9
Changing epidemiology of systemic fungal infections.系统性真菌感染流行病学的变化。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 May;14 Suppl 4:5-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.01978.x.
10
How I treat cryptococcosis in organ transplant recipients.我如何治疗器官移植受者的隐球菌病。
Transplantation. 2012 Jan 15;93(1):17-21. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318236cd1a.

引用本文的文献

1
Cryptococcemia in pancreas-kidney transplant patient.胰腺-肾脏移植患者的隐球菌血症
Med Mycol Case Rep. 2023 Aug 4;41:41-43. doi: 10.1016/j.mmcr.2023.07.004. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Role of Ess1 in growth, morphogenetic switching, and RNA polymerase II transcription in Candida albicans.Ess1 在白念珠菌生长、形态发生转换和 RNA 聚合酶 II 转录中的作用。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059094. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
3
Fks1 and Fks2 are functionally redundant but differentially regulated in Candida glabrata: implications for echinocandin resistance.
Fks1 和 Fks2 在 Candida glabrata 中具有功能冗余性,但受到差异调节:对棘白菌素类耐药性的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Dec;56(12):6304-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00813-12. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
4
Identification of antifungal compounds active against Candida albicans using an improved high-throughput Caenorhabditis elegans assay.利用改良的高通量秀丽隐杆线虫 assay 鉴定抗白色念珠菌的抗真菌化合物。
PLoS One. 2009 Sep 14;4(9):e7025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007025.
5
The structure of the Candida albicans Ess1 prolyl isomerase reveals a well-ordered linker that restricts domain mobility.白色念珠菌Ess1脯氨酰异构酶的结构揭示了一个限制结构域移动性的有序连接子。
Biochemistry. 2005 Apr 26;44(16):6180-9. doi: 10.1021/bi050115l.
6
Aspergillus infections in transplant recipients.移植受者中的曲霉感染。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005 Jan;18(1):44-69. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.1.44-69.2005.
7
Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from transplant recipients are not selected for resistance to calcineurin inhibitors by current immunosuppressive regimens.目前的免疫抑制方案并未筛选出对移植受者的新型隐球菌分离株具有钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂抗性的菌株。
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Jan;43(1):464-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.1.464-467.2005.