Suppr超能文献

人类计时行为背后的脑网络受先前情境的影响。

Brain networks underlying human timing behavior are influenced by prior context.

作者信息

Jantzen Kelly J, Steinberg Fred L, Kelso J A Scott

机构信息

Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 27;101(17):6815-20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401300101. Epub 2004 Apr 12.

Abstract

The continuation paradigm is often used to investigate the behavioral and neural mechanisms of timing. Typically, a movement rate is established by pacing with a metronome. Then, the metronome is turned off and the subject continues at the established rate. Performance during continuation is assumed to be based on internal timing mechanisms. Here, we investigated the degree to which the neural activity underlying time representation depends on the initial pacing context, that is, whether pacing was established by moving in-phase (the usual procedure) or anti-phase (syncopation) with an auditory metronome. Functional MRI was measured from 14 subjects during four conditions: synchronized pacing, synchronized continuation, syncopated pacing, and syncopated continuation. In general, movements were timed consistently for all four conditions. However, a much broader network of activation was engaged during syncopation compared with synchronization, including increased activation in supplementary motor area, left premotor area, right thalamus, bilateral inferior frontal gyrus, and cerebellum. No differences were found when comparing continuation with the preceding pacing phase except for decreased activity in auditory-related regions due to the absence of the metronome. These results demonstrate that the cortical and subcortical areas recruited to support a simple motor timing task depend crucially on the method used to establish the temporal reference. Thus, the neural mechanisms underlying time and timing are highly flexible, reflecting the context in which the timing is established.

摘要

持续范式常被用于研究计时的行为和神经机制。通常,通过跟随节拍器来确定运动速率。然后,关闭节拍器,让受试者以既定速率继续运动。持续运动期间的表现被认为基于内部计时机制。在此,我们研究了时间表征背后的神经活动在多大程度上依赖于初始的节奏设定情境,即节奏设定是通过与听觉节拍器同相运动(通常程序)还是反相运动(切分音)来实现的。对14名受试者在四种条件下进行了功能磁共振成像测量:同步节奏设定、同步持续运动、切分音节奏设定和切分音持续运动。总体而言,在所有四种条件下运动计时都保持一致。然而,与同步相比,切分音期间激活的网络要广泛得多,包括辅助运动区、左前运动区、右丘脑、双侧额下回和小脑的激活增加。除了由于节拍器缺失导致听觉相关区域活动减少外,将持续运动与之前的节奏设定阶段进行比较时未发现差异。这些结果表明,为支持简单运动计时任务而募集的皮质和皮质下区域关键取决于用于建立时间参考的方法。因此,时间和计时背后的神经机制具有高度灵活性,反映了计时建立的情境。

相似文献

1
Brain networks underlying human timing behavior are influenced by prior context.人类计时行为背后的脑网络受先前情境的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 27;101(17):6815-20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401300101. Epub 2004 Apr 12.
8
Neural substrates of real and imagined sensorimotor coordination.真实与想象的感觉运动协调的神经基础。
Cereb Cortex. 2005 Jul;15(7):975-85. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh198. Epub 2004 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Context-specific and context-invariant computations of interval timing.间隔计时的情境特定与情境不变计算
Front Neurosci. 2023 Sep 20;17:1249502. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1249502. eCollection 2023.
4
7
Coordination Dynamics: A Foundation for Understanding Social Behavior.协调动力学:理解社会行为的基础。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Aug 14;14:317. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00317. eCollection 2020.
9
A Tablet-Based Assessment of Rhythmic Ability.基于平板电脑的节奏能力评估
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 1;10:2471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02471. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Timing functions of the cerebellum.小脑的时间功能。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1989 Spring;1(2):136-52. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1989.1.2.136.
3
Transitions between dynamical states of differing stability in the human brain.人类大脑中不同稳定性动态状态之间的转变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20;99(17):10948-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.162114799. Epub 2002 Jul 31.
4
The interplay of attention and bimanual coordination dynamics.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2002 Jun;110(2-3):187-211. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00033-1.
5
Voluntary timing and brain function: an information processing approach.
Brain Cogn. 2002 Feb;48(1):7-30. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1301.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验