Jantzen Kelly J, Steinberg Fred L, Kelso J A Scott
Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 27;101(17):6815-20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401300101. Epub 2004 Apr 12.
The continuation paradigm is often used to investigate the behavioral and neural mechanisms of timing. Typically, a movement rate is established by pacing with a metronome. Then, the metronome is turned off and the subject continues at the established rate. Performance during continuation is assumed to be based on internal timing mechanisms. Here, we investigated the degree to which the neural activity underlying time representation depends on the initial pacing context, that is, whether pacing was established by moving in-phase (the usual procedure) or anti-phase (syncopation) with an auditory metronome. Functional MRI was measured from 14 subjects during four conditions: synchronized pacing, synchronized continuation, syncopated pacing, and syncopated continuation. In general, movements were timed consistently for all four conditions. However, a much broader network of activation was engaged during syncopation compared with synchronization, including increased activation in supplementary motor area, left premotor area, right thalamus, bilateral inferior frontal gyrus, and cerebellum. No differences were found when comparing continuation with the preceding pacing phase except for decreased activity in auditory-related regions due to the absence of the metronome. These results demonstrate that the cortical and subcortical areas recruited to support a simple motor timing task depend crucially on the method used to establish the temporal reference. Thus, the neural mechanisms underlying time and timing are highly flexible, reflecting the context in which the timing is established.
持续范式常被用于研究计时的行为和神经机制。通常,通过跟随节拍器来确定运动速率。然后,关闭节拍器,让受试者以既定速率继续运动。持续运动期间的表现被认为基于内部计时机制。在此,我们研究了时间表征背后的神经活动在多大程度上依赖于初始的节奏设定情境,即节奏设定是通过与听觉节拍器同相运动(通常程序)还是反相运动(切分音)来实现的。对14名受试者在四种条件下进行了功能磁共振成像测量:同步节奏设定、同步持续运动、切分音节奏设定和切分音持续运动。总体而言,在所有四种条件下运动计时都保持一致。然而,与同步相比,切分音期间激活的网络要广泛得多,包括辅助运动区、左前运动区、右丘脑、双侧额下回和小脑的激活增加。除了由于节拍器缺失导致听觉相关区域活动减少外,将持续运动与之前的节奏设定阶段进行比较时未发现差异。这些结果表明,为支持简单运动计时任务而募集的皮质和皮质下区域关键取决于用于建立时间参考的方法。因此,时间和计时背后的神经机制具有高度灵活性,反映了计时建立的情境。