Ruurda J P, Wisselink W, Cuesta M A, Verhagen H J M, Broeders I A M J
Departments of Surgery and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004 May;27(5):501-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.01.009.
Reconstruction of the infrarenal aorta for aneurysms is routinely performed through laparotomy. A less invasive videoscopic approach has not gained wide acceptance due to technical difficulties. Robotic systems could potentially improve imaging of the operative field and surgeon's dexterity during videoscopic surgery and therefore might facilitate the performance of this procedure. The aim of this animal study was to compare the safety and efficacy of a robot-assisted videoscopic aortic replacement to the standard videoscopic approach.
In 10 female pigs, the infrarenal aorta was partially replaced by a 10 mm polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) interposition graft through a videoscopic retroperitoneal approach, using the da Vinci robot system (robot group). Ten other pigs were operated on in a similar fashion, using standard videoscopic instruments (control group). Relevant procedure times, blood loss and complications were registered. Efficacy of the anastomoses was evaluated by measuring patency and blood loss after removing the clamps. Furthermore, circumference and number of stitches were evaluated at autopsy.
The procedure, suturing and clamping times were significantly shorter in the robot group and blood loss was less. In the control group, the inferior vena cava was injured in one pig. In two cases in the control group, haemostasis could not be established after clamp removal. At autopsy, all anastomoses in the robot group were adequate. In the control group, a stitch crossing the aortic lumen was found in two distal anastomoses and a large distance (>3 mm) between two stitches was encountered at least once in 12/20 suture lines. All 20 grafts were patent. No anastomotic narrowing was encountered. The number of stitches used for proximal and distal anastomosis was higher in the robot group.
This study demonstrates the superiority of robot-assisted videoscopic aortic replacement over standard videoscopic techniques in an animal model.
肾下腹主动脉瘤的重建通常通过剖腹手术进行。由于技术困难,侵入性较小的视频镜检查方法尚未得到广泛接受。机器人系统可能会改善视频镜手术中手术视野的成像以及外科医生的灵活性,因此可能有助于该手术的实施。本动物研究的目的是比较机器人辅助视频镜主动脉置换术与标准视频镜方法的安全性和有效性。
在10只雌性猪中,使用达芬奇机器人系统通过视频镜后腹膜途径,用10毫米聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)插入移植物部分替换肾下腹主动脉(机器人组)。另外10只猪以类似方式使用标准视频镜器械进行手术(对照组)。记录相关手术时间、失血量和并发症。通过测量松开血管夹后的通畅情况和失血量评估吻合口的有效性。此外,在尸检时评估吻合口周长和缝线数量。
机器人组的手术、缝合和夹闭时间明显更短,失血量更少。在对照组中,1只猪的下腔静脉受损。在对照组的2例中,松开血管夹后无法止血。尸检时,机器人组的所有吻合口均合适。在对照组中,在2个远端吻合口中发现1针穿过主动脉腔,并且在12/20条缝合线中至少有1次遇到2针之间的距离较大(>3毫米)。所有20个移植物均通畅。未遇到吻合口狭窄。机器人组近端和远端吻合使用的缝线数量更多。
本研究证明了在动物模型中机器人辅助视频镜主动脉置换术优于标准视频镜技术。