Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助腹腔镜下肾下腹主动脉手术:早期学习曲线

Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the infrarenal aorta : the early learning curve.

作者信息

Diks J, Nio D, Jongkind V, Cuesta M A, Rauwerda J A, Wisselink W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2007 Oct;21(10):1760-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9197-9. Epub 2007 Mar 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently introduced robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) facilitates endoscopic surgical manipulation and thereby reduces the learning curve for (advanced) laparoscopic surgery. We present our learning curve with RALS for aortobifemoral bypass grafting as a treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease.

METHODS

Between February 2002 and May 2005, 17 patients were treated in our institution with robot-assisted laparoscopic aorto-bifemoral bypasses. Dissection was performed laparoscopically and the robot was used to make the aortic anastomosis. Operative time, clamping time, and anastomosis time, as well as blood loss and hospital stay, were used as parameters to evaluate the results and to compare the first eight (group 1) and the last nine patients (group2).

RESULTS

Total median operative, clamping, and anastomosis times were 365 min (range: 225-589 min), 86 min (range: 25-205 min), and 41 min (range: 22-110 min), respectively. Total median blood loss was 1,000 ml (range: 100-5,800 ml). Median hospital stay was 4 days (range: 3-57 days). In this series 16/18 anastomoses were completed with the use of the robotic system. Three patients were converted (two in group 1, one in group 2), and one patient died postoperatively (group 1). Median clamping and anastomosis times were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (111 min [range: 85-205 min] versus 57.5 min [range: 25-130 min], p < 0.01 and 74 min [range: 40-110 min] versus 36 min [range: 22-69 min], p < 0.01, respectively) Total operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay showed no significant difference between groups 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted aortic anastomosis was shown to have a steep learning curve with considerable reduction of clamping and anastomosis times. However, due to a longer learning curve for laparoscopic dissection of the abdominal aorta, operation times were not significantly shortened. Even with robotic assistance, laparoscopic aortoiliac surgery remains a complex procedure.

摘要

背景

最近引入的机器人辅助腹腔镜手术(RALS)有助于内镜手术操作,从而缩短(高级)腹腔镜手术的学习曲线。我们展示了我们使用RALS进行主-双股动脉搭桥术治疗主髂动脉闭塞性疾病的学习曲线。

方法

2002年2月至2005年5月期间,我们机构对17例患者进行了机器人辅助腹腔镜主-双股动脉搭桥手术。腹腔镜下进行解剖,使用机器人进行主动脉吻合。手术时间、阻断时间、吻合时间以及失血量和住院时间被用作评估结果的参数,并比较前8例患者(第1组)和后9例患者(第2组)。

结果

总的中位手术时间、阻断时间和吻合时间分别为365分钟(范围:225 - 589分钟)、86分钟(范围:25 - 205分钟)和41分钟(范围:22 - 110分钟)。总的中位失血量为1000毫升(范围:100 - 5800毫升)。中位住院时间为4天(范围:3 - 57天)。在本系列中,16/18例吻合是使用机器人系统完成的。3例患者中转开腹(第1组2例,第2组1例),1例患者术后死亡(第1组)。第1组和第2组之间的中位阻断时间和吻合时间有显著差异(分别为111分钟[范围:85 - 205分钟]对57.5分钟[范围:25 - 130分钟],p < 0.01;74分钟[范围:40 - 110分钟]对36分钟[范围:22 - 69分钟],p < 0.01)。第1组和第2组之间的总手术时间、失血量和住院时间无显著差异。

结论

机器人辅助主动脉吻合显示出陡峭的学习曲线,阻断时间和吻合时间显著缩短。然而,由于腹主动脉腹腔镜解剖的学习曲线较长,手术时间并未显著缩短。即使有机器人辅助,腹腔镜主髂动脉手术仍然是一个复杂的手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验