• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙齿颜色材料与乳牙牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度。

Microtensile bond strength of tooth-colored materials to primary tooth dentin.

作者信息

Suwatviroj Preenan, Messer Louise B, Palamara Joseph E A

机构信息

University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Pediatr Dent. 2004 Jan-Feb;26(1):67-74.

PMID:15080362
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study measured the microtensile bond strengths of 2 tooth-colored restorative materials with and without conditioning of primary teeth dentin, and examined the micromorphology of the debonded surfaces and material-dentin interfaces.

METHODS

Cylindrical specimens of packable composite resin (PCR) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) bonded to dentin of primary teeth were ground to an hourglass shape and tested for microtensile bond strength. The debonded surfaces and material-dentin interfaces were prepared and examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM).

RESULTS

The microtensile bond strength values (mean +/- SD, in MPa) of PCR (Filtek P60 with Single Bond) and RMGIC (Fuji II LC), with or without the application of Cavity Conditioner (14.8 +/- 5.36, 12.01 +/- 4.43, 11.94 +/- 4.60, respectively), did not differ significantly (P > .05). Partial adhesive and partial cohesive failures within the restorative material predominated. The distributions of failure modes did not differ significantly between groups (P > .05). Under SEM, each material was seen to be closely adapted to dentin. Dentinal tubules were enlarged with etching, and the depth of penetration of resin tags of PCR was greater than for RMGIC. Smear plugs were incompletely removed by cavity conditioning.

CONCLUSIONS

The bond strength of the PCR, Filtek P60 with Single Bond, to dentin of primary teeth was comparable to that of the RMGIC, Fuji II LC. Conditioning of the cavity preparation with Cavity Conditioner did not improve the bond strength of Fuji II LC. The distribution of failure modes did not differ between materials.

摘要

目的

本研究测量了两种牙齿颜色修复材料在有无对乳牙牙本质进行预处理情况下的微拉伸粘结强度,并检查了脱粘表面和材料 - 牙本质界面的微观形态。

方法

将可压实复合树脂(PCR)和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)粘结到乳牙牙本质上的圆柱形标本磨成沙漏形状,并测试其微拉伸粘结强度。制备脱粘表面和材料 - 牙本质界面,并在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下进行检查。

结果

PCR(Filtek P60搭配Single Bond)和RMGIC(Fuji II LC)在使用或不使用窝洞调节剂的情况下,微拉伸粘结强度值(平均值±标准差,单位为MPa)分别为(14.8±5.36、12.01±4.43、11.94±4.60),差异无统计学意义(P>.05)。修复材料内部分为粘结性破坏和内聚性破坏,且以粘结性破坏为主。各实验组间破坏模式分布差异无统计学意义(P>.05)。在扫描电子显微镜下,每种材料均与牙本质紧密贴合。酸蚀后牙本质小管扩大,PCR树脂突的渗透深度大于RMGIC。窝洞预处理未能完全去除玷污层。

结论

PCR(Filtek P60搭配Single Bond)与乳牙牙本质的粘结强度与RMGIC(Fuji II LC)相当。使用窝洞调节剂进行窝洞预处理并未提高Fuji II LC的粘结强度。不同材料的破坏模式分布无差异。

相似文献

1
Microtensile bond strength of tooth-colored materials to primary tooth dentin.牙齿颜色材料与乳牙牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度。
Pediatr Dent. 2004 Jan-Feb;26(1):67-74.
2
A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin.几种牙本质粘结系统与乳牙和恒牙牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度比较。
Dent Mater. 2002 May;18(3):239-45. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00041-0.
3
Bond strength and interface micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass ionomer cement.一种改良型树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的粘结强度及界面微观形态
Am J Dent. 1997 Jun;10(3):128-32.
4
SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth.用于乳牙和恒牙牙本质粘结的自酸蚀底漆粘结系统的扫描电子显微镜研究
Pediatr Dent. 2001 Jul-Aug;23(4):315-20.
5
Effect of conditioner on bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin/enamel with and without smear layer interposition.粘结剂对有或无玷污层介入情况下玻璃离子粘结剂与牙本质/牙釉质粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2004 Nov-Dec;29(6):685-92.
6
Resin bond strength and micromorphology of human teeth prepared with an Erbium:YAG laser.铒钇铝石榴石激光制备的人牙的树脂粘结强度和微观形态
Am J Dent. 2004 Oct;17(5):331-6.
7
In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.采用两步酸蚀-冲洗和自酸蚀牙本质黏结系统对有和无衬层的后牙复合树脂微渗漏的体外比较。
Oper Dent. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):213-21. doi: 10.2341/10-215-L. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
8
Bond strengths of glass ionomer restoratives to primary vs permanent dentin.玻璃离子修复材料与乳牙和恒牙牙本质的粘结强度。
ASDC J Dent Child. 2000 Mar-Apr;67(2):112-6, 82.
9
Effect of Smear Layers Created by Different Burs on Durability of Self-Etching Adhesive Bond to Dentin of Primary Teeth.不同车针形成的玷污层对自酸蚀粘结剂与乳牙牙本质粘结耐久性的影响。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Spring;39(3):224-30. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-39.3.224.
10
Towards a better understanding of the adhesion mechanism of resin-modified glass-ionomers by bonding to differently prepared dentin.通过对不同处理的牙本质进行粘结,以更好地了解树脂改良型玻璃离子水门汀的粘结机制。
J Dent. 2010 Nov;38(11):921-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.08.009. Epub 2010 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A Critical Review on the Factors Affecting the Bond Strength of Direct Restorative Material Alternatives to Amalgam.关于影响直接修复材料替代汞合金粘结强度因素的批判性综述。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Oct 1;17(19):4853. doi: 10.3390/ma17194853.
2
Effect of endodontic sealers on bond strength of restorative systems to primary tooth pulp chamber.根管封闭剂对修复系统与乳牙牙髓腔粘结强度的影响。
J Dent Sci. 2017 Jun;12(2):112-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Aug 10.