• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

免疫疗法安全性:一项关于过敏性疾病生物标准化治疗性疫苗的前瞻性多中心监测研究。

Immunotherapy safety: a prospective multi-centric monitoring study of biologically standardized therapeutic vaccines for allergic diseases.

作者信息

Moreno C, Cuesta-Herranz J, Fernández-Távora L, Alvarez-Cuesta E

机构信息

Allergy Department, Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Apr;34(4):527-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.1819.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.1819.x
PMID:15080803
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The fear of side-effects has led to strict regulations preventing a more widespread use of specific immunotherapy (SIT) in some countries, in spite of the low risk of systemic reactions (SRs) reported in well-controlled studies. The goal of the study was to carry out a prospective and multi-centric trial to evaluate the safety, risk factors and compliance degree of commercially available SIT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was carried out in 14 allergy departments from Spain. Four-hundred and eighty-eight patients with rhinitis and/or asthma were submitted to treatment with biologically standardized allergen extracts commercially available. They were administered following the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guidelines.

RESULTS

Four hundred and twenty-three patients (86.7%) completed the treatment and remained under control at the end of the trial. Out of 17,526 administered doses, 17,368 doses (99.1%) were not associated with a reaction. Eighteen patients (3.7%) experienced 53 (0.3% of the doses) SRs. All immediate SRs were mild or moderate and responded well to ordinary treatment measures. There were no fatal reactions, anaphylactic shock or life-threatening reactions. A higher ratio of SRs was found among asthmatic and dust mite allergic patients, although multi-variable logistic analysis did not demonstrate any risk factor associated with SRs. There was also a subgroup of patients at risk for recurrent reactions, and therefore 40% of SRs had been avoided if the maximal number of SRs had been previously limited to only three SRs.

CONCLUSIONS

This multi-centric study showed that SIT was a safe treatment with a very good compliance. Future guidelines of SIT should limit the maximal number of SRs.

摘要

背景

尽管在严格控制的研究中报告的全身反应(SRs)风险较低,但对副作用的担忧导致一些国家出台了严格的规定,限制了特异性免疫疗法(SIT)的更广泛应用。本研究的目的是开展一项前瞻性多中心试验,以评估市售SIT的安全性、风险因素和依从程度。

材料与方法

该研究在西班牙的14个过敏科进行。488例鼻炎和/或哮喘患者接受了市售生物标准化变应原提取物的治疗。治疗遵循欧洲变态反应和临床免疫学会指南进行。

结果

423例患者(86.7%)完成了治疗,试验结束时病情得到控制。在17526剂给药中,17368剂(99.1%)未发生反应。18例患者(3.7%)出现了53次SRs(占给药剂量的0.3%)。所有即刻SRs均为轻度或中度,对常规治疗措施反应良好。未发生致命反应、过敏性休克或危及生命的反应。在哮喘患者和尘螨过敏患者中发现SRs的比例较高,尽管多变量逻辑分析未显示与SRs相关的任何风险因素。也有一部分患者有反复发生反应的风险,因此,如果之前将SRs的最大数量限制在仅3次,则可避免40%的SRs。

结论

这项多中心研究表明,SIT是一种安全的治疗方法,依从性非常好。未来的SIT指南应限制SRs的最大数量。

相似文献

1
Immunotherapy safety: a prospective multi-centric monitoring study of biologically standardized therapeutic vaccines for allergic diseases.免疫疗法安全性:一项关于过敏性疾病生物标准化治疗性疫苗的前瞻性多中心监测研究。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Apr;34(4):527-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.1819.x.
2
Systemic tolerability of specific subcutaneous immunotherapy with index-of-reactivity-standardized allergen extracts administered using clustered regimens: a retrospective, observational, multicenter study.采用聚类方案给予反应指数标准化变应原提取物进行特异性皮下免疫治疗的全身耐受性:一项回顾性、观察性、多中心研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009 Mar;102(3):247-52. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60088-9.
3
Side-effects of allergen-specific immunotherapy: a prospective multi-centre study.变应原特异性免疫疗法的副作用:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2006 Mar;36(3):254-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2006.02340.x.
4
[Evaluation of the pediatric aspects of the WHO document and meta-analysis of immunotherapy].[世界卫生组织文件儿科方面的评估及免疫疗法的荟萃分析]
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2000 May-Jun;28(3):82-9.
5
A prospective Italian survey on the safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy for respiratory allergy.一项关于皮下免疫治疗呼吸道过敏安全性的意大利前瞻性调查。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Oct;39(10):1569-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03286.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
6
Safety and efficacy of allergen immunotherapy in the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma in real life.变应原免疫疗法在现实生活中治疗变应性鼻炎和哮喘的安全性与有效性。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2008 Dec;10(12):869-72.
7
Combination of omalizumab and specific immunotherapy is superior to immunotherapy in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and co-morbid seasonal allergic asthma.对于患有季节性变应性鼻结膜炎合并季节性变应性哮喘的患者,奥马珠单抗与特异性免疫疗法联合使用优于单纯免疫疗法。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Feb;39(2):271-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03121.x. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
8
Rhinitis and asthma co-morbidity in respiratory allergy due to house dust mite: results of an observational open controlled parallel group study in real-life setting.屋尘螨所致呼吸道过敏中鼻炎与哮喘的共病情况:一项现实生活环境下的观察性开放对照平行组研究结果
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Apr;37(4):135-42.
9
Prevention of allergic disease in childhood: clinical and epidemiological aspects of primary and secondary allergy prevention.儿童过敏性疾病的预防:一级和二级过敏预防的临床与流行病学方面
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2004 Jun;15 Suppl 16:4-5, 9-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2004.0148b.x.
10
A prospective study of asthma desensitization in 1182 children, 592 asthmatic children and 590 nonatopic controls.一项针对1182名儿童的哮喘脱敏前瞻性研究,其中包括592名哮喘儿童和590名非特应性对照儿童。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2005 Nov-Dec;9(6):325-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of a microcrystalline tyrosine-adjuvanted Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus allergoid immunotherapy in adult patients with allergic asthma and rhinitis: A real-life prospective observational study.微晶酪氨酸佐剂的屋尘螨变应原疫苗免疫疗法在成年过敏性哮喘和鼻炎患者中的有效性和安全性:一项真实世界前瞻性观察研究。
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2022 May;10(5):e585. doi: 10.1002/iid3.585.
2
Systemic reactions to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy: real-world cause and effect modelling.皮下过敏原免疫疗法的全身反应:真实世界的因果建模
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2021 Jul 6;17(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13223-021-00566-x.
3
A single centre retrospective study of systemic reactions to subcutaneous immunotherapy.
一项关于皮下免疫疗法全身反应的单中心回顾性研究。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 Nov 2;16(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13223-020-00491-5.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Allergen Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis.皮下变应原免疫疗法治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效与安全性
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2018 Jan;10(1):1-3. doi: 10.4168/aair.2018.10.1.1.
5
Allergen immunotherapy in asthma; what is new?哮喘的变应原免疫疗法;有哪些新进展?
Asthma Res Pract. 2015 Jul 15;1:6. doi: 10.1186/s40733-015-0006-2. eCollection 2015.
6
Therapeutic interventions in severe asthma.重度哮喘的治疗干预措施。
World Allergy Organ J. 2016 Nov 28;9(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40413-016-0130-3. eCollection 2016.
7
Systemic Reactions to Dust Mite Subcutaneous Immunotherapy: A 3-Year Follow-up Study.尘螨皮下免疫疗法的全身反应:一项3年随访研究。
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2016 Sep;8(5):421-7. doi: 10.4168/aair.2016.8.5.421.
8
Sublingual immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization position paper 2013 update.舌下免疫治疗:世界过敏组织 2013 年立场文件更新。
World Allergy Organ J. 2014 Mar 28;7(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1939-4551-7-6.
9
Immunotherapy safety: what have we learned from surveillance surveys?免疫疗法安全性:从监测调查中我们了解到了什么?
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2013 Aug;13(4):381-8. doi: 10.1007/s11882-013-0353-0.
10
Sub-lingual immunotherapy: world allergy organization position paper 2009.舌下免疫疗法:世界过敏组织2009年立场文件
World Allergy Organ J. 2009 Nov;2(11):233-81. doi: 10.1097/WOX.0b013e3181c6c379. Epub 2009 Nov 19.