Jordan D R, Brownstein S, Dorey M, Yuen V Ho, Gilberg S
University of Ottawa Eye Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Mar;20(2):136-43. doi: 10.1097/01.iop.0000117341.28846.7f.
To evaluate the porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implant in a rabbit model and compare it with three other currently available porous implants: Bio-Eye coralline hydroxyapatite (HA), FCI(3) synthetic HA, and aluminum oxide (Bioceramic).
The porous polyethylene implant was examined macroscopically and microscopically (with scanning electron microscopy). Implantation was performed in 10 adult male New Zealand albino rabbits. Each animal underwent enucleation of the right globe under general halothane gas anesthesia, followed by placement of a 12-mm porous polyethylene implant. In 5 animals, the implant was encased in polyglactin 910 (Vicryl mesh); in the other 5, it was left unwrapped. The implants were moistened in saline before placement. Implant vascularization was evaluated by histopathology at 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 weeks.
The porous polyethylene implant was found to have a smoother exterior surface than the Bio-Eye, FCI(3) synthetic HA, and aluminum oxide implants. Rather than a uniform interconnected porous architecture, there was an extensive system of interconnected channels through the implant, ranging in size from 125 to 1000 microm. On high-power examination there was a more solid, woven appearance without any sign of the microcrystals seen in the other porous implants. One rabbit had a retrobulbar hemorrhage after surgery and was euthanized. All the other rabbits tolerated the implant well, and there were no complications. On histopathologic examination, fibrovascularization gradually increased over time. One implant was completely vascularized at 12 weeks, and both implants harvested at 16 weeks were completely vascularized. The implant harvested at 24 weeks showed only partial vascularization (14%).
The porous polyethylene orbital implant represents an alternative implant for use after enucleation or evisceration or for secondary implantation. In our rabbit model, the porous polyethylene implant was well tolerated without complication. Complete fibrovascularization was first seen at 12 weeks. Porous polyethylene orbital implants appear to vascularize more slowly than Bio-Eye coralline HA, FCI(3) synthetic HA, and aluminum oxide implants.
在兔模型中评估多孔聚乙烯(Medpor)眼眶植入物,并将其与其他三种目前可用的多孔植入物进行比较:Bio-Eye珊瑚羟基磷灰石(HA)、FCI(3)合成HA和氧化铝(生物陶瓷)。
对多孔聚乙烯植入物进行宏观和微观检查(扫描电子显微镜)。在10只成年雄性新西兰白兔身上进行植入。每只动物在氟烷气体全身麻醉下摘除右眼眼球,然后植入一个12毫米的多孔聚乙烯植入物。5只动物的植入物用聚乙醇酸910(薇乔网)包裹;另外5只则不包裹。植入前将植入物在盐水中湿润。在4、8、12、16和24周时通过组织病理学评估植入物的血管化情况。
发现多孔聚乙烯植入物的外表面比Bio-Eye、FCI(3)合成HA和氧化铝植入物更光滑。植入物并非具有均匀的相互连接的多孔结构,而是有一个贯穿植入物的广泛的相互连接通道系统,通道大小从125到1000微米不等。在高倍检查时,其外观更坚实、呈编织状,没有其他多孔植入物中所见的微晶迹象。一只兔子术后发生球后出血并被安乐死。所有其他兔子对植入物耐受良好,没有并发症。组织病理学检查显示,纤维血管化随时间逐渐增加。一个植入物在12周时完全血管化,16周时取出的两个植入物均完全血管化。24周时取出的植入物仅显示部分血管化(14%)。
多孔聚乙烯眼眶植入物是眼球摘除术或眼内容剜出术后或二期植入时使用的一种替代植入物。在我们的兔模型中,多孔聚乙烯植入物耐受良好,无并发症。12周时首次出现完全纤维血管化。多孔聚乙烯眼眶植入物的血管化似乎比Bio-Eye珊瑚HA、FCI(3)合成HA和氧化铝植入物更慢。