Healy Daniel P, Holland Edward J, Nordlund Michael L, Dunn Steven, Chow Christopher, Lindstrom Richard L, Hardten David, Davis Elizabeth
Cincinnati Eye Institute, Cincinnati, OH 45242, USA.
Cornea. 2004 Apr;23(3):255-63. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200404000-00007.
To evaluate the penetration of commercially available levofloxacin 0.5%, ofloxacin 0.3%, and ciprofloxacin 0.3% topical ophthalmic solutions in human corneal stromal and aqueous humor tissues.
A total of 67 patients scheduled to undergo penetrating keratoplasty for treatment of stromal scar or dystrophy, keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, or endothelial disease were enrolled in this prospective, double-blind, 3-center study. To be considered for inclusion, patients had to have an intact corneal epithelium and minimal or no corneal edema (pachymetry < 650 microm). After informed consent was obtained, patients were randomized to receive 1 drop of levofloxacin 0.5%, ofloxacin 0.3%, or ciprofloxacin 0.3% topical ophthalmic solution at approximately 15 and 10 minutes before surgery. Approximately 0.1 mL of aqueous fluid was aspirated by paracentesis through the trephination wound at the onset of surgery, followed by excision of the affected cornea and removal of its epithelium. Specimens were stored frozen at -70 degrees C until assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography.
All 3 fluoroquinolones were well tolerated. A total of 65 corneas and 59 aqueous fluid samples were obtained and assayed. The mean +/- standard deviation corneal concentrations of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and levofloxacin following a 2-drop administration were 9.92 +/- 10.99 microg/g (n = 18), 10.77 +/- 5.90 microg/g (n = 23), and 18.23 +/- 20.51 microg/g (n = 24), respectively. Although corneal stromal levels were highest in the levofloxacin group, the high degree of interpatient variability prevented demonstration of statistically significant differences when compared with ofloxacin (P = 0.377). In contrast, levofloxacin concentrations were approximately twice as high as ciprofloxacin, and this difference reached statistical significance (P = 0.014). The corresponding aqueous humor concentrations of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and levofloxacin were 0.135 +/- 0.231 microg/mL (n = 15), 0.135 +/- 0.111 microg/mL (n = 20), and 0.372 +/- 0.546 microg/mL (n = 24, P < 0.001 versus ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin).
The topical administration of all 3 agents was well tolerated in patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty. Two drops of levofloxacin 0.5% solution results in a 1.7- to 2.7-fold greater penetration into human corneal stromal and aqueous humor tissues than ofloxacin 0.3% or ciprofloxacin 0.3%. The mean intracorneal concentrations of all three agents following 2 drops exceeds the MIC90 for the majority of pathogens causing bacterial keratitis. Topical levofloxacin appears to offer pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantages over ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in terms of enhanced transcorneal penetration; however, clinical comparative trials are needed to confirm these relative advantages.
评估市售0.5%左氧氟沙星、0.3%氧氟沙星和0.3%环丙沙星局部用眼科溶液在人角膜基质和房水中的渗透情况。
本前瞻性、双盲、三中心研究共纳入67例计划行穿透性角膜移植术治疗基质瘢痕或营养不良、圆锥角膜、透明边缘变性或内皮疾病的患者。要被纳入研究,患者必须有完整的角膜上皮且角膜水肿轻微或无水肿(角膜厚度测量<650微米)。获得知情同意后,患者被随机分为在手术前约15分钟和10分钟接受1滴0.5%左氧氟沙星、0.3%氧氟沙星或0.3%环丙沙星局部用眼科溶液。手术开始时通过穿刺经环钻伤口抽取约0.1毫升房水,随后切除患角膜并去除其上皮。标本冷冻保存在-70℃直至通过高效液相色谱法进行检测。
所有3种氟喹诺酮类药物耐受性良好。共获得并检测了65个角膜和59份房水样本。给予2滴药物后,环丙沙星、氧氟沙星和左氧氟沙星的平均±标准差角膜浓度分别为9.92±10.99微克/克(n = 18)、10.77±5.90微克/克(n = 23)和18.23±20.51微克/克(n = 24)。虽然左氧氟沙星组的角膜基质水平最高,但与氧氟沙星相比,患者间高度变异性使得无法证明存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.377)。相比之下,左氧氟沙星浓度约为环丙沙星的两倍,且这种差异具有统计学显著性(P = 0.014)。环丙沙星、氧氟沙星和左氧氟沙星相应的房水浓度分别为0.135±0.231微克/毫升(n = 15)、0.135±0.111微克/毫升(n = 20)和0.372±0.546微克/毫升(n = 24,与环丙沙星和氧氟沙星相比P<0.001)。
所有3种药物局部给药在接受穿透性角膜移植术的患者中耐受性良好。2滴0.5%左氧氟沙星溶液在人角膜基质和房水中的渗透比0.3%氧氟沙星或0.3%环丙沙星高1.7至2.7倍。给予2滴后,所有3种药物的平均角膜内浓度超过了大多数引起细菌性角膜炎病原体的MIC90。就增强的角膜穿透而言,局部用左氧氟沙星似乎比氧氟沙星和环丙沙星具有药代动力学和药效学优势;然而,需要进行临床对比试验来证实这些相对优势。