Pea Federico, Viale Pierluigi, Candoni Anna, Pavan Federica, Pagani Leonardo, Damiani Daniela, Casini Marco, Furlanut Mario
Department of Experimental and Clinical Pathology and Medicine, Medical School, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43(6):405-15. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200443060-00004.
To define the optimal dosage regimen of teicoplanin that ensures early therapeutically relevant trough concentrations (C(min)) [>10 mg/L at 24 hours and possibly close to 20 mg/L at 48 hours] in patients with acute leukaemia who develop febrile neutropenia after chemotherapy.
Prospective observational pharmacokinetic study.
Adult patients (n = 33) with normal renal function previously treated with antineoplastic chemotherapy because of acute lymphocytic or acute nonlymphocytic leukaemia, and subsequently developing febrile neutropenia treated with empirical antimicrobial therapy.
First, the standard dosage group (n = 11) was administered standard loading and maintenance doses of teicoplanin (400 mg every 12 hours for three doses followed by 400 mg once daily). Blood samples were collected at defined times as part of routine monitoring and assessed for teicoplanin plasma concentration by fluorescence polarisation immunoassay. Secondly, the high dosage group (n = 22) received a high loading regimen (800 + 400 mg 12 hours apart on day 1, 600 + 400mg 12 hours apart on day 2) followed by a high maintenance regimen (400 mg every 12 hours) from day 3 on.
In the standard dosage group, no patient had the recommended teicoplanin C(min) of >or=10 mg/L within the first 72 hours, and only five of the 11 patients (45%) had a C(min) of >or=10 mg/L after 120 hours. No patient had a C(min) of >or=20 mg/L. In the high dosage group, teicoplanin C(min) averaged >or=10 mg/L within 24 hours, and this value was achieved within 48 hours in all but one patient. Of note, C(min) at 72 hours exceeded 20 mg/L in ten of the 22 patients (45%). No patient experienced significant impairment of renal function.
In this patient group, therapeutically relevant C(min) may be achieved very early in the treatment period with loading doses of 12 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg 12 hours apart on day 1, and 9 mg/kg and 6 mg/kg 12 hours apart on day 2, regardless of renal function. Subsequently, in patients with normal renal function a maintenance dosage of 6 mg/kg every 12 hours may be helpful in ensuring C(min) close to 20 mg/L. Assessment of C(min) after 48-72 hours may be useful to individualise teicoplanin therapy. Factors increasing volume of distribution and/or renal clearance of teicoplanin (fluid load, hypoalbuminaemia, leukaemic status) may explain the need for higher dosages.
确定替考拉宁的最佳给药方案,以确保化疗后发生发热性中性粒细胞减少的急性白血病患者早期达到治疗相关的谷浓度(C(min))[24小时>10 mg/L,48小时可能接近20 mg/L]。
前瞻性观察性药代动力学研究。
33例成年患者,因急性淋巴细胞白血病或急性非淋巴细胞白血病接受过抗肿瘤化疗,肾功能正常,随后发生发热性中性粒细胞减少并接受经验性抗菌治疗。
首先,标准剂量组(n = 11)给予替考拉宁标准负荷剂量和维持剂量(每12小时400 mg,共3剂,随后每日1次400 mg)。在规定时间采集血样作为常规监测的一部分,并通过荧光偏振免疫测定法评估替考拉宁血浆浓度。其次,高剂量组(n = 22)在第1天接受高负荷方案(800 + 400 mg,间隔12小时),第2天接受600 + 400mg,间隔12小时,从第3天开始接受高维持方案(每12小时400 mg)。
在标准剂量组中,在前72小时内没有患者达到推荐的替考拉宁C(min)≥10 mg/L,11例患者中只有5例(45%)在120小时后C(min)≥10 mg/L。没有患者C(min)≥20 mg/L。在高剂量组中,替考拉宁C(min)在24小时内平均≥10 mg/L,除1例患者外,所有患者在48小时内达到该值。值得注意的是,22例患者中有10例(45%)在72小时时C(min)超过20 mg/L。没有患者出现明显的肾功能损害。
在该患者组中,无论肾功能如何,在治疗期早期给予第1天间隔12小时的12 mg/kg和6 mg/kg负荷剂量以及第2天间隔12小时的9 mg/kg和6 mg/kg负荷剂量,可能达到治疗相关的C(min)。随后,对于肾功能正常的患者,每12小时6 mg/kg的维持剂量可能有助于确保C(min)接近20 mg/L。在48 - 72小时后评估C(min)可能有助于个体化替考拉宁治疗。增加替考拉宁分布容积和/或肾清除率的因素(液体负荷、低白蛋白血症、白血病状态)可能解释了需要更高剂量的原因。