Menezes M M, Valera M C, Jorge A O C, Koga-Ito C Y, Camargo C H R, Mancini M N G
Department of Restorative Dentistry, São José dos Campos School of Dentistry, Paulista State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Int Endod J. 2004 May;37(5):311-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00799.x.
To evaluate in vitro the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), chlorhexidine (CHX) and five intracanal medicaments on microorganisms within root canals.
Ninety-six human single-rooted extracted teeth were used. After removing the crowns, canal preparation was completed and the external root surfaces were coated with epoxy resin. Following sterilization, the teeth were contaminated with Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis, and were incubated at 37 +/- 1 degrees C for 7 days. The teeth were divided according to the irrigant solution or intracanal medicament: group 1, sterile physiologic solution (SPS) and calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) paste; group 2, SPS and camphorated paramonochlorophenol (CPMC); group 3, SPS and tricresol formalin; group 4, SPS and CaOH2 + CPMC paste; group 5, SPS and PMC furacin; group 6, 2.5% NaOCl without intracanal medication; group 7, 2.0% CHX without intracanal medication and group 8, SPS without intracanal medication (control group). Microbiological samples were collected with sterile paper points, and bacterial growth was determined. The data were submitted to the analysis of variance (anova, P = 0.05).
For C. albicans, groups 3 and 8 were statistically less effective than groups 1, 2, 4 and 5 (Kruskal-Wallis (K-W) = 65.241; gl = 7; P = 0.001). For E. faecalis, groups 6 and 8 were statistically less effective than groups 1-4 and 7 (K-W = 61.048; gl = 7; P = 0.001).
Ca(OH)2 + CPMC paste was the most effective intracanal medicament for the elimination of the two microorganisms; 2.0% CHX solution was more effective than 2.5% NaOCl against E. faecalis.
在体外评估次氯酸钠(NaOCl)、氯己定(CHX)及五种根管内药物对根管内微生物的有效性。
使用96颗人类单根离体牙。去除牙冠后,完成根管预备,并用环氧树脂包裹牙根外表面。灭菌后,将牙齿用白色念珠菌和粪肠球菌污染,并在37±1℃下孵育7天。根据冲洗液或根管内药物将牙齿分组:第1组,无菌生理溶液(SPS)和氢氧化钙(Ca(OH)2)糊剂;第2组,SPS和樟脑对氯苯酚(CPMC);第3组,SPS和三甲酚甲醛;第4组,SPS和CaOH2+CPMC糊剂;第5组,SPS和呋喃西林;第6组,2.5%NaOCl且无根管内用药;第7组,2.0%CHX且无根管内用药;第8组,SPS且无根管内用药(对照组)。用无菌纸尖采集微生物样本,并测定细菌生长情况。数据进行方差分析(anova,P=0.05)。
对于白色念珠菌,第3组和第8组在统计学上比第1、2、4和5组效果差(Kruskal-Wallis(K-W)=65.241;自由度=7;P=0.001)。对于粪肠球菌,第6组和第8组在统计学上比第1-4组和第7组效果差(K-W=61.048;自由度=7;P=0.001)。
Ca(OH)2+CPMC糊剂是消除这两种微生物最有效的根管内药物;2.0%CHX溶液对粪肠球菌的效果优于2.5%NaOCl。