• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Is lawful discrimination against illicit drug users acceptable?

作者信息

Wodak Alex D, Lynch Philip A, Crofts Nick

机构信息

Alcohol and Drug Service, St, Australia. Vincent's Hospital, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2004 Apr 19;180(8):405-7.

PMID:15089731
Abstract

A Bill currently being considered by the Australian Parliament (the Disability Discrimination Amendment Bill 2003 [Cwlth]) would, if enacted, make discrimination lawful against people who are currently addicted to prohibited drugs and not currently in drug treatment. The government argues that the Bill is needed to keep the work and social environment safe, respond to community concerns, provide certainty to individuals and organisations, and force drug users into treatment. If enacted, we believe the Bill will infringe several national commitments to human rights, damage the wellbeing of family and other associates, and generate expensive litigation because of the difficulty of proving current addiction and current drug treatment; risk deterring drug users from seeking drug treatment and impair their ability to obtain employment and accommodation; represent a further attempt to reduce drug use by increasing the health, social and other costs of using illegal drugs, rather than assisting drug users to deal with their problem through health and social interventions that are less expensive, more effective and less counterproductive.

摘要

相似文献

1
Is lawful discrimination against illicit drug users acceptable?
Med J Aust. 2004 Apr 19;180(8):405-7.
2
[Can discrimination ban guarantee equality of opportunities for disabled persons?].[禁止歧视能保障残疾人的机会平等吗?]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1997 Nov;36(4):209-12.
3
[Commentary on the Government Bill of an Anti-Discrimination Law, ADG of Dec. 14, 2004].
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2005 Jun;44(3):186. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-866874.
4
Drug use and human rights: privacy, vulnerability, disability, and human rights infringements.
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1996 Spring;12(2):355-447.
5
Open letter from the Disability Discrimination Commissioner.残疾歧视问题专员的公开信。
Lamp. 1995 May;52(4):41-2.
6
Drugs, discrimination and disability.
J Law Med. 2009 Dec;17(3):400-11.
7
Illicit drug users in Northern Ireland: perceptions and experiences of health and social care professionals.北爱尔兰的非法药物使用者:医疗和社会护理专业人员的看法与经历
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2006 Dec;13(6):682-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.01015.x.
8
Addiction and the Americans with Disabilities Act.成瘾与《美国残疾人法案》。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2002;30(3):355-63.
9
Stigma, discrimination and the health of illicit drug users.污名、歧视与非法药物使用者的健康。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 May 11;88(2-3):188-96. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.10.014. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
10
[War on Drugs or War against Health? The pitfalls for public health of Puerto Rican drug policy].[毒品战争还是健康之战?波多黎各毒品政策对公共健康的危害]
P R Health Sci J. 2003 Mar;22(1):49-59.