• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[禁止歧视能保障残疾人的机会平等吗?]

[Can discrimination ban guarantee equality of opportunities for disabled persons?].

作者信息

Günther H

机构信息

Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Sozialordnung, Bonn.

出版信息

Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1997 Nov;36(4):209-12.

PMID:9490457
Abstract

Embodied in Germany's Basic Law since 1994, the discrimination ban on behalf of disabled persons--in line with similar provisions introduced in other countries--highlights the fact that disabled persons, as individuals and with their lawful rights, have become the point of departure of disability policies, as opposed to the hitherto prevailing social welfare perspective. Banning discrimination alone, though, will enable equal opportunities to be achieved only for some areas of social life; positive discriminations in favour of disabled persons are possible and necessary in addition. When it comes to integration into worklife, banning discrimination against disabled persons will achieve but little. Rather, in a market economy, employers and the general public share a common responsibility, for one, by respecting employers' rights of disposal over their jobs and, for the other, by changing present labour market conditions in favour of disabled persons, i.e., taking measures of positive discrimination.

摘要

自1994年起,德国《基本法》中体现的针对残疾人的歧视禁令——与其他国家出台的类似规定一致——凸显了这样一个事实,即残疾人作为个体及其合法权利,已成为残疾政策的出发点,这与此前盛行的社会福利视角形成了鲜明对比。然而,仅靠禁止歧视只能在社会生活的某些领域实现平等机会;此外,对残疾人进行积极的差别对待也是可行且必要的。在融入工作生活方面,禁止对残疾人的歧视收效甚微。相反,在市场经济中,雇主和公众负有共同责任,一方面要尊重雇主对其工作岗位的处置权,另一方面要改变当前有利于残疾人的劳动力市场状况,即采取积极差别对待的措施。

相似文献

1
[Can discrimination ban guarantee equality of opportunities for disabled persons?].[禁止歧视能保障残疾人的机会平等吗?]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1997 Nov;36(4):209-12.
2
[Severely disabled employees and their experiences with corporate policies concerning job retention. Selected results of an empirical study].[重度残疾员工及其对企业留用政策的体验。一项实证研究的部分结果]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2001 Aug;40(4):226-34. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-15990.
3
Impact of social factors on labour discrimination of disabled women.社会因素对残疾女性劳动歧视的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Nov-Dec;30(6):1115-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.07.013. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
4
[Reform steps toward networking sheltered workshops and the general labour market].[使庇护工场与一般劳动力市场联网的改革步骤]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2010 Feb;49(1):38-47. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1246144. Epub 2010 Feb 22.
5
[Commentary on the Government Bill of an Anti-Discrimination Law, ADG of Dec. 14, 2004].
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2005 Jun;44(3):186. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-866874.
6
Is lawful discrimination against illicit drug users acceptable?
Med J Aust. 2004 Apr 19;180(8):405-7.
7
[The Law on (Re)integration of Disabled Persons].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Jan 9;143(2):108-11.
8
Mental health and inequity: a human rights approach to inequality, discrimination, and mental disability.心理健康与不平等:从人权角度看待不平等、歧视和精神残疾
Health Hum Rights. 2009;11(2):19-31.
9
Health insurance more available: Federal legislation effective July 1.医疗保险更易获得:联邦立法于7月1日生效。
AIDS Treat News. 1997 Jul 18(No 275):1-3.
10
New trends in vocational rehabilitation and employment of disabled persons.残疾人职业康复与就业的新趋势。
G Ital Med Lav. 1984 Jan-Mar;6(1-2):5-9.