Pickel Kerri L
Department of Psychological Science, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306, USA.
Memory. 2004 Jan;12(1):14-26. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000072.
This research investigated whether generating misinformation impairs memory for actual information. After watching a videotaped robbery, some witnesses were interviewed about it, but others did not rehearse the event details. One week later, the witnesses tried to remember the robber's appearance. In Experiment 1, those who fabricated a description of the robber during the interview and those who did not rehearse remembered fewer correct details than did truthful witnesses or those who fabricated about another person. Witnesses who fabricated about the robber also reported more incorrect details than did truthful or non-interviewed witnesses. In Experiment 2, witnesses who fabricated about the robber performed as poorly on the memory test as did witnesses who answered interview questions using false information prepared for them. In both experiments deceptive witnesses sometimes reported invented details on the memory test, suggesting that they may have come to believe some fabrications.
这项研究调查了编造错误信息是否会损害对实际信息的记忆。在观看一段抢劫录像后,一些目击者接受了关于该事件的询问,而另一些人则没有复述事件细节。一周后,目击者试图回忆抢劫者的外貌。在实验1中,那些在询问过程中编造抢劫者描述的人和那些没有复述的人,比起如实作证的目击者或编造关于其他人的描述的人,记住的正确细节更少。编造抢劫者描述的目击者比如实作证或未接受询问的目击者报告的错误细节也更多。在实验2中,编造抢劫者描述的目击者在记忆测试中的表现与那些使用为他们准备的虚假信息回答询问问题的目击者一样差。在两个实验中,具有欺骗性的目击者有时在记忆测试中报告了编造的细节,这表明他们可能已经开始相信一些编造内容。