Suppr超能文献

接种还是解毒?认知访谈时机对强行编造事件虚假记忆的影响。

Inoculation or antidote? The effects of cognitive interview timing on false memory for forcibly fabricated events.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Kings College, Old Aberdeen, AB24 2UB, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Law Hum Behav. 2010 Apr;34(2):105-17. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9172-6. Epub 2009 Mar 20.

Abstract

This study examined whether a cognitive interview (CI) can counteract the effects of suggestive interviews involving forced fabrication. College students witnessed a filmed event and were later forced to fabricate answers to misleading questions about the event. All witnesses were interviewed with a non-leading CI or free recall (FR) either before or after the forced fabrication phase. A week later participants completed a recognition and source monitoring (SM) test of video content. Relative to FR, the CI administered before the forced fabrication interview increased reports of correct details and reduced false assents to fabricated items. A CI after resulted in false memory rates comparable to the FR group. Early interviews using CI techniques may protect against memory loss and misinformation effects.

摘要

本研究旨在考察认知访谈(CI)是否可以抵消涉及强制编造的暗示性访谈的影响。大学生观看了一段录像事件,之后被迫对事件中的误导性问题编造答案。所有证人在强制编造阶段之前或之后都接受了非引导性 CI 或自由回忆(FR)的访谈。一周后,参与者完成了对视频内容的识别和来源监测(SM)测试。与 FR 相比,在强制编造访谈之前进行的 CI 增加了正确细节的报告,并减少了对编造项目的虚假肯定。而在强制编造访谈之后进行的 CI 则导致错误记忆率与 FR 组相当。使用 CI 技术的早期访谈可能有助于防止记忆丧失和错误信息的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验