Fletcher Courtney V, Yogev Ram, Nachman Sharon A, Wiznia Andrew, Pelton Stephen, McIntosh Kenneth, Stanley Kenneth
Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group and the Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Apr;24(4):453-9. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.5.453.33343.
To evaluate and describe the parameters and characteristics of different drug regimens in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
Randomized, open-label, multicenter study.
Pediatric HIV research clinics in the United States and Puerto Rico.
Twenty-one HIV-infected children, aged 3-14 years, who were clinically stable and treated with the same antiretroviral therapy for 16 weeks or longer.
In step 1, children were randomized to receive one of three treatment regimens: zidovudine plus lamivudine, ritonavir plus zidovudine and lamivudine, or ritonavir plus stavudine. Patients originally assigned to the zidovudine plus lamivudine group in step 1 were eligible to progress to step 2 if their HIV RNA values at week 12, 24, or 36 were 10,000 copies/ml or greater but 100,000 copies/ml or less. In step 2 they received a regimen of ritonavir plus stavudine and nevirapine.
Seven children were randomized to each of the three treatment regimens. Concentrations of the agents were quantitated at steady state after observed doses, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. Nevirapine concentrations were not determined. One child was excluded from analysis because pharmacokinetic parameters could not be estimated. Ritonavir oral clearance was slower in the pooled cohort of children who received stavudine compared with zidovudine and lamivudine. Stavudine oral clearance was marginally faster when combined with ritonavir and nevirapine compared with only ritonavir.
Therapy for HIV is complex, and pharmacodynamic data indicate that relationships exist between systemic concentrations of antiretroviral drugs and virologic response. Careful drug interaction studies have not been conducted for all treatment regimens, and it will not be surprising if unexpected interactions are found. Pharmacokinetic studies to address these considerations should be viewed as a fundamental component of antiretroviral drug development, as they represent a tool to improve pharmacotherapy for HIV-infected children.
评估并描述感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)儿童不同药物治疗方案的参数及特征。
随机、开放标签、多中心研究。
美国和波多黎各的儿科HIV研究诊所。
21名3至14岁的HIV感染儿童,临床状况稳定,接受相同抗逆转录病毒治疗16周或更长时间。
第一步,将儿童随机分为接受三种治疗方案之一:齐多夫定加拉米夫定、利托那韦加齐多夫定和拉米夫定、或利托那韦加司他夫定。第一步中最初分配到齐多夫定加拉米夫定组的患者,如果其在第12、24或36周时的HIV RNA值为每毫升10000拷贝或更高但每毫升100000拷贝或更低,则有资格进入第二步。在第二步中,他们接受利托那韦加司他夫定和奈韦拉平的治疗方案。
三种治疗方案各随机分配7名儿童。在观察剂量后于稳态时对药物浓度进行定量,并确定药代动力学参数。未测定奈韦拉平浓度。1名儿童因无法估计药代动力学参数而被排除在分析之外。与接受齐多夫定和拉米夫定的儿童合并队列相比,接受司他夫定的儿童合并队列中利托那韦的口服清除率较慢。与仅使用利托那韦相比,司他夫定与利托那韦和奈韦拉平联合使用时口服清除率略快。
HIV治疗很复杂,药效学数据表明抗逆转录病毒药物的全身浓度与病毒学反应之间存在关联。并非对所有治疗方案都进行了仔细的药物相互作用研究,如果发现意外的相互作用也不足为奇。解决这些问题的药代动力学研究应被视为抗逆转录病毒药物研发的基本组成部分,因为它们是改善HIV感染儿童药物治疗的一种工具。