Nachman S A, Stanley K, Yogev R, Pelton S, Wiznia A, Lee S, Mofenson L, Fiscus S, Rathore M, Jimenez E, Borkowsky W, Pitt J, Smith M E, Wells B, McIntosh K
Department of Pediatrics, State University of New York at Stony Brook, 11794-8111, USA.
JAMA. 2000 Jan 26;283(4):492-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.4.492.
Although protease inhibitors are used routinely in adults with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, the role of these drugs in the treatment of clinically stable HIV-infected children is not clear.
To evaluate the safety, tolerance, and virologic response produced by a change in antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected children who were clinically and immunologically stable while receiving previous therapy.
The Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 338, a multicenter, phase 2, randomized, open-label controlled trial conducted from February 6 to April 30, 1997 (patient entry period); patients were followed up for 48 weeks.
Pediatric HIV research clinics in the United States and Puerto Rico.
Two hundred ninety-seven antiretroviral-experienced, protease inhibitor-naive, clinically stable HIV-infected children aged 2 to 17 years.
Children were randomized to receive zidovudine, 160 mg/m2 3 times per day, plus lamivudine, 4 mg/kg 2 times per day (n = 100); the same regimen plus ritonavir, 350 mg/m2 2 times per day (n = 100); or ritonavir, 350 mg/m2 2 times per day, and stavudine, 4 mg/kg 2 times per day (n = 97).
Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels at study weeks 12 and 48, compared among the 3 treatment groups.
At study week 12, 12% of patients in the zidovudine-lamivudine group had undetectable plasma HIV RNA levels (<400 copies/mL) compared with 52% and 54% of patients in the 2- and 3-drug ritonavir-containing groups, respectively (P<.001). Through study week 48, 70% of children continued receiving their ritonavir-containing regimen. At study week 48, 42% of children receiving ritonavir plus 2 nucleosides compared with 27% of those receiving ritonavir and a single nucleoside had undetectable HIV RNA levels (P = .04); however, similar proportions in each group continuing initial therapy had HIV RNA levels of less than 10000 copies/mL (58% vs 48%, respectively; P = .19).
In our study, change in antiretroviral therapy to a ritonavir-containing regimen was associated with superior virologic response at study week 12 compared with change to a dual nucleoside analog regimen. More children receiving ritonavir in combination with 2 compared with 1 nucleoside analog had undetectable HIV RNA levels at study week 48.
虽然蛋白酶抑制剂常用于成人人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染患者,但这些药物在临床稳定的HIV感染儿童治疗中的作用尚不清楚。
评估在接受先前治疗时临床和免疫状况稳定的HIV感染儿童中,抗逆转录病毒疗法改变后产生的安全性、耐受性和病毒学反应。
儿科艾滋病临床试验组338,这是一项多中心、2期、随机、开放标签对照试验,于1997年2月6日至4月30日进行(患者入组期);对患者进行了48周的随访。
美国和波多黎各的儿科HIV研究诊所。
297名有抗逆转录病毒治疗经验、未使用过蛋白酶抑制剂、临床稳定的2至17岁HIV感染儿童。
儿童被随机分为接受齐多夫定,160mg/m²,每日3次,加拉米夫定,4mg/kg,每日2次(n = 100);相同方案加利托那韦,350mg/m²,每日2次(n = 100);或利托那韦,350mg/m²,每日2次,加司他夫定,4mg/kg,每日2次(n = 97)。
在研究第12周和第48周时3个治疗组之间比较血浆HIV-1 RNA水平。
在研究第12周时,齐多夫定-拉米夫定组中12%的患者血浆HIV RNA水平不可检测(<400拷贝/mL),而含利托那韦的二联和三联药物组中分别为52%和54%(P<0.001)。到研究第48周时,70%的儿童继续接受含利托那韦的治疗方案。在研究第48周时,接受利托那韦加2种核苷的儿童中有42%的HIV RNA水平不可检测,而接受利托那韦和1种核苷的儿童中这一比例为27%(P = 0.04);然而,每组中继续初始治疗的相似比例患者HIV RNA水平低于10000拷贝/mL(分别为58%对48%;P = 0.19)。
在我们的研究中,与改为双核苷类似物方案相比,抗逆转录病毒疗法改为含利托那韦的方案在研究第12周时病毒学反应更好。在研究第48周时,与接受利托那韦和1种核苷类似物相比,接受利托那韦与2种核苷类似物联合治疗的更多儿童HIV RNA水平不可检测。