• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

表征物体和动作词汇的意义:特征性与整体性语义空间假说

Representing the meanings of object and action words: the featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis.

作者信息

Vigliocco Gabriella, Vinson David P, Lewis William, Garrett Merrill F

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University College of London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H OAP, UK.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2004 Jun;48(4):422-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.09.001.

DOI:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.09.001
PMID:15099798
Abstract

This paper presents the Featural and Unitary Semantic Space (FUSS) hypothesis of the meanings of object and action words. The hypothesis, implemented in a statistical model, is based on the following assumptions: First, it is assumed that the meanings of words are grounded in conceptual featural representations, some of which are organized according to modality. Second, it is assumed that conceptual featural representations are bound into lexico-semantic representations that provide an interface between conceptual knowledge and other linguistic information (syntax and phonology). Finally, the FUSS model employs the same principles and tools for objects and actions, modeling both domains in a single semantic space. We assess the plausibility of the model by showing that it can capture generalizations presented in the literature, in particular those related to category-related deficits, and show that it can predict semantic effects in behavioral experiments for object and action words better than other models such as Latent Semantic Analysis (Landauer & Dumais, 1997) and similarity metrics derived from Wordnet (Miller & Fellbaum, 1991).

摘要

本文提出了关于物体和动作词汇意义的特征与统一语义空间(FUSS)假说。该假说通过一个统计模型来实现,基于以下假设:首先,假定词汇的意义基于概念特征表征,其中一些是根据模态来组织的。其次,假定概念特征表征被绑定到词汇语义表征中,这些表征在概念知识与其他语言信息(句法和音系)之间提供了一个接口。最后,FUSS模型对物体和动作采用相同的原则和工具,在单一语义空间中对这两个领域进行建模。我们通过表明该模型能够捕捉文献中呈现的一般规律,特别是那些与类别相关缺陷有关的规律,来评估模型的合理性,并表明它在行为实验中对物体和动作词汇的语义效应的预测比其他模型(如潜在语义分析(Landauer & Dumais,1997)以及从Wordnet派生的相似性度量(Miller & Fellbaum,1991))更好。

相似文献

1
Representing the meanings of object and action words: the featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis.表征物体和动作词汇的意义:特征性与整体性语义空间假说
Cogn Psychol. 2004 Jun;48(4):422-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.09.001.
2
Semantic context and visual feature effects in object naming: an fMRI study using arterial spin labeling.物体命名中的语义语境和视觉特征效应:一项使用动脉自旋标记的功能磁共振成像研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1571-83. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21114.
3
A neural network model of semantic memory linking feature-based object representation and words.一种将基于特征的对象表示与单词相联系的语义记忆神经网络模型。
Biosystems. 2009 Jun;96(3):195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2009.01.006. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
4
Semantic memory in object use.物体使用中的语义记忆。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Oct;47(12):2634-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.013. Epub 2009 May 29.
5
Mapping the semantic homunculus: a functional and behavioural analysis of overt semantic generation.绘制语义小人:公开语义生成的功能与行为分析
Brain Topogr. 2008 Sep;21(1):22-35. doi: 10.1007/s10548-008-0043-8. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
6
Real object use facilitates object recognition in semantic agnosia.真实物体的使用有助于语义失认症患者的物体识别。
Neurocase. 2009;15(2):135-44. doi: 10.1080/13554790802680321. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
7
The similarities (and familiarities) of pseudowords and extremely high-frequency words: examining a familiarity-based explanation of the pseudoword effect.假词和超高频率词的相似性(和熟悉性):检验基于熟悉性的假词效应解释。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jan;37(1):123-39. doi: 10.1037/a0021099.
8
Self-organizing semantic maps and its application to word alignment in Japanese-Chinese parallel corpora.
Neural Netw. 2004 Oct-Nov;17(8-9):1241-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2004.07.011.
9
Negative priming in naming of categorically related objects: an fMRI study.对类别相关物体命名中的负启动效应:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Cortex. 2008 Jul-Aug;44(7):881-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.02.005. Epub 2007 Dec 23.
10
Semantics in action: an electrophysiological study on the use of semantic knowledge for action.行动中的语义:一项关于语义知识在行动中运用的电生理研究。
J Physiol Paris. 2008 Jan-May;102(1-3):95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.011. Epub 2008 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A multimodal transformer-based tool for automatic generation of concreteness ratings across languages.一种基于多模态变压器的工具,用于自动生成跨语言的具体性评级。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 8;3(1):100. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00280-z.
2
Leveraging Context for Perceptual Prediction Using Word Embeddings.利用词嵌入的上下文进行感知预测。
Cogn Sci. 2025 Jun;49(6):e70072. doi: 10.1111/cogs.70072.
3
Tracking neural correlates of contextualized meanings with representational similarity analysis.用表征相似性分析追踪情境化意义的神经关联。
J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 27;45(19). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0409-24.2025.
4
Experientially-grounded and distributional semantic vectors uncover dissociable representations of conceptual categories.基于经验和分布语义的向量揭示了概念类别的可分离表征。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Jul 12;39(8):1020-1044. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2023.2232481. eCollection 2024.
5
What we mean when we say semantic: Toward a multidisciplinary semantic glossary.我们所说的语义是什么意思:迈向一个多学科语义词汇表。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):243-280. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
6
Salient semantics.显著语义
Synthese. 2024;204(2):39. doi: 10.1007/s11229-024-04669-x. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
7
Differences in perceptual representations in multilinguals' first, second, and third language.多语言者的第一、第二和第三语言中感知表征的差异。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jul 1;18:1408411. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1408411. eCollection 2024.
8
Electrophysiological alterations during action semantic processing in Parkinson's disease.帕金森病动作语义加工过程中的电生理改变。
Neurobiol Aging. 2024 Apr;136:78-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
9
Keeping track of time: Horizontal spatial biases for hours, days, and months. 时间追踪:小时、天和月的水平空间偏向。
Mem Cognit. 2024 May;52(4):894-908. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01508-1. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
10
Breakdown of category-specific word representations in a brain-constrained neurocomputational model of semantic dementia.大脑受限的语义痴呆神经计算模型中特定类别词汇表示的分解。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 10;13(1):19572. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41922-8.