Furlanello F, Guarnerio M, Inama G, Vergara G, Del Greco M, Bertoldi A, Dallago M
Divisione di Cardiologia e Centro Aritmologico, Ospedale S. Chiara, Trento, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 1992 Aug 20;70(5):19A-25A. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)91073-d.
We report our experience with flecainide and propafenone therapy for inducible supraventricular tachycardias and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias due to atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry or the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. We performed an electropharmacologic test (ET) that consisted of first inducing a clinical arrhythmia by transesophageal atrial pacing (TAP) protocol. This was followed by intravenous drug administration and TAP reevaluation, either after acute intravenous administration or in oral steady-state. We used ET with flecainide and/or propafenone to study 2 groups of patients at least 3 years before the long-term clinical observation period. The first group was comprised of 58 patients with reciprocating tachycardias--due to AV node reentry in 17 (29.3%) and anomalous pathway in 41 (70.7%). Twelve (29.3%) of the latter had reciprocating tachycardias, 15 (36.6%) had atrial fibrillation, and 14 (34.2%) had both arrhythmias. During ET, flecainide was administered to 42 patients, and the ET was considered positive in 28 (66.7%). Propafenone was administered to 32 patients, with positive results in 15 (46.9%). In 15 patients, both flecainide and propafenone were tested, 8 receiving flecainide after a negative ET with propafenone, and 7 receiving propafenone after a negative ET with flecainide. In the first group, the ET was positive in 7 (87.5%), and in the second group, it was positive in 3 (42.9%). In a follow-up of 40.1 +/- 11 months, 38 (65.5%) patients had positive outcomes, 5 (8.6%) had to stop receiving the drugs because of side effects, 3 (5.2%) stopped because of inefficacy, and 12 (20.7%) dropped out.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们报告了使用氟卡尼和普罗帕酮治疗因房室(AV)结折返或预激综合征引起的可诱导性室上性心动过速和阵发性室上性心动过速的经验。我们进行了一项电药理学测试(ET),该测试首先通过经食管心房起搏(TAP)方案诱发临床心律失常。随后在急性静脉给药后或口服稳态时进行静脉给药和TAP重新评估。在长期临床观察期前至少3年,我们使用氟卡尼和/或普罗帕酮的ET研究了2组患者。第一组由58例折返性心动过速患者组成,其中17例(29.3%)因AV结折返,41例(70.7%)因异常通路。后者中12例(29.3%)有折返性心动过速,15例(36.6%)有房颤,14例(34.2%)两者都有。在ET期间,42例患者使用了氟卡尼,其中28例(66.7%)ET结果为阳性。32例患者使用了普罗帕酮,15例(46.9%)结果为阳性。15例患者同时接受了氟卡尼和普罗帕酮测试,7例在普罗帕酮ET阴性后接受氟卡尼,8例在氟卡尼ET阴性后接受普罗帕酮。第一组中,ET阳性7例(87.5%),第二组中阳性3例(42.9%)。在40.1±11个月的随访中,38例(65.5%)患者预后良好,5例(8.6%)因副作用停药,3例(5.2%)因无效停药,12例(20.7%)退出研究。(摘要截断于250字)